Talk:Eye of the Gorgon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Good...
The pages are staying, good, but one thing I would like to change is until will have a plot to write, leave the plot and just have a synopsis. Any different ideas?--Wiggstar69 23:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A Few Questions
These may have been answered in Part II for all I know, but Part I raised a few questions that puzzle me. 1...does anyone with zoom-ability or who knows how to take scenes off a T.V. and put them online know if the two clocks [Bea's, and then the one with Mrs. Randall talking about 1951] gave a date? 2...Alan's statement of "6 months ago" confuses the recent furor over dating of IOTB and ROTS even more. Can anyone clear things up? 3...If Edgar and Bea discovered the talisman in Syria "50 years ago" [who told Sarah this date? Bea didn't], then how does it relate to the death of either Stheno or Euryale? 4...How did the nuns know about Edgar's find? 5...Why did the sisterhood leave Greece? 6...Why did they go to Syria? 7...Why did they come to England. 8...Of all the abbeys and nursing homes in England, why did the sisters choose St. Agnes and why did Bea choose Lavendar Lawns? 9...Have Clyde and Luke got no ability to whatsoever to stop three [possibly] Human nuns from kidnapping one of them? 10...The episode seems to take longer than two days, yet no-one has to go back to school. Why not? [User: Stripey]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.10.67 (talk) 13:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- I would be interested about dates although most of these questions seem to forget that this is a television programme and is not to be taken too seriously.--Wiggstar69 13:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- A few good errors there. Try them at The Tardis Index File. Those articles need updated badly. StuartDD contributions 21:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. :)
[edit] Plot
Can we make sure we get part 2 for this plot finished, since the plot for warriors of the Kudlack has already been started.--Wiggstar69 21:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Hope my effort's good enough? [User: Stripey]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.11.221 (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Star Trek Reference
The article for The Empty Child mentions that in the episode is the first ever mention of star trek in a televised story. Should this also be included in outside references in this article? 68.226.119.187 (talk) 07:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC) No, as a Doctor Who episode is continuity, not an outside reference. Only a reference to Star Trek was needed. Digifiend (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Clyde's comment
When he says 'in 40 years he will be able to take his brain and put it in a robot to live forever' I'm pretty sure he means that in the sense of guessing what the future holds rather than actually knowing for fact that that sort of thing is possible in 40 years time as that sort of thing is not consistent with the Doctor Who history. Though it may be a reference to the cybermen. Any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.87.166.229 (talk) 08:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
ok it's gone now because I can see it's been added/removed a couple times before for not being a direct reference to the cybermen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.87.166.229 (talk) 09:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
