User talk:ExplicitImplicity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New message. | Archive1 |
Contents |
[edit] hi
Cool page. I thought all of your feedback was interesting and thoughtful. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jchristie7 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 22 July 2007.
[edit] Deletion Review: Pataphor
I hope you'll leave your opinion on the matter, if you think it should remain. Thanks, jchristie7
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_22
[edit] re: sock
Yes, unfortunately I have used sock puppets, although it happened slowly and I didn't mean it as an insult to anyone, but it was a mistake and I'm sorry. You're a good and true person, and I wish you well.
[edit] Aesthetics project
The reception seems luke warm for getting a bot to tag articles as part of these fields in philosophy. I think after people see the result they will be quite pleased. I am going to propose that we get a bot to tag articles for one task force just to see how it goes. I think the Aesthetics project is ready for this. I listed some categories whose articles all should be within the Aesthetics project there. I am going to forward a request to the bot in about a week unless there is an outcry against it. (Which I would not understand at all.)
I haven't announced this proposal on the WP:PHILO discussion yet. I wanted to give you a shot at commenting on it first since you are active in the project. I just want to move this forward. Any help would be appreciated. Gregbard 03:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Spinalcord trirev vexedlamina.svg
It's a beautiful image, but there's a typo: it's Rexed lamina, not "Vexed". --Arcadian 00:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bellhop
I have added an image to the Bellhop article per your {{reqphoto}} request. -Gr0ff
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ASEA logo modern.png}
Thank you for uploading Image:ASEA logo modern.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Aeschylus
Hi, I found a mismatch between your Aeschylus quote and the quote that appears in your source (http://www.english.emory.edu/DRAMA/Aesch.html). The disputed word is "despair". Your source quotes "despite" in its stead. A google search for that quote shows more results for "despair" than for "despite". "Despite" could make more sense and the source of "despair" might be Kennedy's probable misquote in his speech (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCg05pTYt0A) after Martin Luther King Jr's death. You can actually hear him stuttering before saying "despair".
Interesting, huh!?
Best regards,
Bruno
(bruno.testa@gmail.com)
--189.62.166.13 (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Johnny_depp_ecb29.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Johnny_depp_ecb29.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)