Talk:Expansion plans for Milton Keynes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Buckinghamshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

Just out of interest, is there any more inf oon the H1 link up or any other grid-related matters? I'd sure like to see it. User:Tom walker 20:39 GMT 15 August 2006

The "build on the reserrvation" was in one of the local papers. It must be more credible than the cost of an embankment plus an A5 over-bridge when there are other main roads so close. The orginal Master Plan had an A5 exit there. --Concrete Cowboy 21:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Can you tell me anything of the V8 plans? The link up near Fenny Lock... I love the grid I hate the partnership throwing it away like they are. User:Tom walker 22:12 19 August 2006

The V10 to extend to Little Linford Lane ? - at last another rat run ! All of the traffic that currently backs up through the Poets Estate now has somewhere else to go. Brilliant joined up thinking.

Strictly it isn't the V10. It will have a 30 limit on it... Would be better if it was a proper 60mph grid road, but there you go.

[edit] City Centre redevelopment

Can we expand the section on the City Centre to take http://www.miltonkeynes.gov.uk/mkgrowth/documents/Central%2DCMK%5FFramework%5FSPD%5F%2D%5FFinal%5Fv3%2Epdf into account ? This planning guidance was published in Sept 2006 and seems to be putting forward a radical change in City Centre development opportunities eg at the rear of Saxon Court, outside Christ the Cornerstone Church, outside M & S to name but a few. It also seems to be saying that parking in the Centre will be at gateway multi-storeys with existing surface car parks available for building on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.232.76.36 (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Remember that this is a encyclopedia that anyone can edit! Anyone can add, anyone can improve what is there, even delete what's wrong. So, since you've clearly read the planning guidance in some detail, why don't you add a paragraph about it? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)