Talk:Evidence Eliminator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've removed the edits about the critical sites as they aren't really relevant and seem to be an attempt at subtly discrediting them by implying an agenda on their part. Ydam 23:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

I have attempted to clean up the article a bit. The article as it is is perhaps somewhat soft on the company, but does contain links to critical sites. If someone can better document allegations that Robin Hood Software are themselves spammers, etc., please do so, with references. I think it is difficult to find neutral sources on this, since the "flame war" between RHS and its critics has been so intense. --Brianyoumans 21:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Evel.png

Image:Evel.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

But after all is still confuse to everybody that try to get that software, now what next ? what the consumers can do ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.75.131 (talk) 11:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)