Talk:European Newspaper Publishers Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.enpa.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=24&Itemid=43. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to license this material under the GNU Free Documentation License. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by OTRS volunteers, under ticket number 2008060310018923. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en at wikimedia dot org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Yes, this text is taken from the ENPA website - which, as an employee, I wrote myself. An email has been send to permissions stating that this text can be used.

The previous version I wrote was unjustifiably deleted, so this has been rewritten and I believe should be acceptable. It is very similar to the entry on the World Association of Newspapers.

If there are any issues please do not hesistate to write on this wall and inform me before deleting the article.

Summersso (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Because this article has been deleted once for being promotional, you really should not have re-created it without seeking help from more experienced editors. A better approach would have been to create it as a subpage of your user page first, User:Summersso/European Newspaper Publishers Association for example, and asked for it to be reviewed by other editors before posting to the mainspace. As it is you still have a massive COI and merely reposting the article in almost identical terms as the deleted article will obviously attract extra attention from new page patrollers. – ukexpat (talk) 15:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Here's some coverage of what others said about the Association, rather than what the Association says about itself. Suggest doing as ukexpat said, create a draft using reliable sources and not spam. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Please look at the user page I've created, edit it as you feel free and approve. I hope the copyright issue is resolved since I've send TWO emails now to permissions from an ENPA email address authorising the use of text which is currently also on the website. Summersso (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The article is currently up for discussion, feel free to weigh in there. I don't agree with your bias against newspapers that Google happened to spider but the only way the article will be allowed to remain is if the claims made can be verified by reliable sources. Primary sources are generally not sufficient for these purposes. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 14:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)