Talk:Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	This article is within the scope of the Arab world WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

Contents 1 Merge with Eurabia 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Eurabia.jpg 3 WikiProject class rating 4 Fair use rationale for Image:Eurabia.jpg

[edit] Merge with Eurabia

===>Clearly overlapping I just don't know which one should be the redirect... Probably the book title. Justin (koavf) 03:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• Agree, move the other one here. Also, is it really accurate to call this a "non-fiction stub"? The author may claim it's non-fiction, but... Palmiro | Talk 13:16, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Do not merge One is a book page, the other is on the topic of Eurabia. --Amenra 02:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • As fictional topics go, I don't think this one has quite reached the Harry Potter level of public interest yet. Palmiro | Talk 04:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Its picking up a lot of steam considering it just got published.--CltFn 05:40, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Merge Yuber^(talk) 06:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment -- Is it notable? Whosez? If so (and I'm not sure it is) why not rename it as (book)? This kind of thing comes up again and again, where provocatively titled books receive article headings that a] reflect their titles and b] (by an extraordinary coincidence) leave an article like Muslim Cannibalism or something as a scary headline supposedly representing a real phenomenon. Surely there must be a title protocol on this by now? BYT 12:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm only surprised that Muslim Cannibalism came up as a red link. Palmiro | Talk 14:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Merge, big time Dsol 14:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps it should be mentioned that "Eurabia" was a word coined by French intellectuals in favor of Islamic immigration, not something dreamt up by Bat Ye'or?

• Merge--Kitrus 03:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

NOT merge. This is a separate topic: a book. Discuses Eurabia, yes, but a particular POV of this author. No reason to squeeze it into the general article. Mukadderat 09:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Eurabia.jpg

Image:Eurabia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Eurabia.jpg

Image:Eurabia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)