User talk:EthicsGradient
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, EthicsGradient! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:
- Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
- When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
- Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
- Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!
And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, EthicsGradient, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 19:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re-referencing Argument from Love
Hi EthicsGradient. In your deletion vote on Argument from Love you wrote "delete unless re-referenced and re-written". I've added several more refs and amended it a bit. Is this enough for you to keep the article (not of course a question of whether you agree with it)? I'm happy to add more refs and material if that would change your vote. NBeale 12:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi NBeale. I had another look on the page. The problem is that while there are lot of references to links between the perception of love and the existence of God in theological literature, the article presents something like a formal proof. Unless there is a source that actually spells out The Argument from Love in a formal manner, presenting it like this would be original research. --EthicsGradient 13:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
