Talk:Ethyl carbamate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Ethyl carbamate is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the wikiproject's quality scale. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
Anyone know anything about Urethane production during wine making?
what the hack where is this page i am trying to do research and there is no page so make one
- sheesh. 100k+ articles of free content, and still the readers complain :-( you're just going to have to do your research somewhere else, then come back and tell use all about it -- Tarquin 23:42 Mar 11, 2003 (UTC)
[edit] Polyurethane = polymer with urethane linkage
Isn't a polymer with urethane linkages called polyurethane ? This article implies just "urethane" is ok for the polymer name. H Padleckas 18:32, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Changes & Recommendation to Ethyl Carbamate
I have added a large amount of material & references to this record on 5/14/2006.
I recommend that the title be changed back to "Urethane" because this is used more generally by regulatory agencies (EPA, NIEHS, NLM,etc.) Oldsci 19:23, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- I would recommend against this. Wikipedia policy is to have the most common usage as the page title. Ethyl carbamate isn't so frequently encountered as a chemical. More often the word "urethane" is used colloquially for polyurethane or to refer to the carbamate functionality. If you feel strongly that the page should be moved back the procedure is to list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves, following the directions there. Dr Zak 15:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] i. e.
Ok, just a little tiny peeve, it looks real weird to have i.e. separated by a auto line break like i. e. it just looks dumb. I don't know how to fix it or I would've. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.252.54 (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
