User talk:Esprit de corps

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Esprit de corps (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

Blocked indef.

Per here: [1]. Socks are bad! If you wish to contest this blocking please use the {{unblock}} template. ScarianCall me Pat! 14:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Why am I being blocked, NONE of my contributions have been vandalism, look and see. I don't know who Daniel Chase, Enigmma, or Persian poet girl are. You're blocking me because I logged in on a public computer, the same ones that some vandal used? This makes no sense and it's not fair. Please unblock me."

Decline reason: "Per Scarian and Alison -- clearly a good block. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Here's an example of some vandalism: [2]. You were appropriately warned for it too. :-) Bye-bye. ScarianCall me Pat! 16:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Yes I did do that I forgot. It was over the Fenway Park article. But where did I vandalize any of the people you named? Nowhere. 40,000+ people go to this school and they all use the library's computers with the same ranges of IP addresses. It wasn't me who did that other stuff. Please unblock me."

Decline reason: "I'd suggest emailing one of those administrators. Based on what they have, this appears to be a properly placed block. Using multiple accounts to vandalize or evades blocks is against policy. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • Admins: - this block is to be regarded as a checkuser block, as this editor has shared two very distinct IP addresses, including a domestic ISP , with a single, indefblocked vandal who has been involved in abusive socking to harassing others - Alison ❤ 21:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Fuck those administrators, I did nothing to them. And yet they are allowed to codemn me for some idiot who vandalized from the one of thousands of IP addresses here at UMCP that they think is me. I am only guilty of lashing out at an editor for Fenway Park, nothing else. Unblock me now."

Decline reason: "That tone of voice just got this page protected. COngrats. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.