Talk:Esoteric astrology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The neutrality of this article is disputed. See discussion on talk page." But talk page was there none. Was there evere one? Was it upsetting to someone? I find the article hard to understand, surely what an encyclopedia for general use says should be written in meaningful words.SilasW 20:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Editors often add these types of templates without any actual discussion, so although a template says "See talk page" or something similar, there has been no such discussion.— Sam 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Clarifcation
The article's meaning may be more apparent after my reducing its florid language. The huge display of every type of astrology belonged, not here in a specific astrology's article, but in the main Astrology article, where indeed it can be seen.Sceptical--SilasW 16:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] remove template
Given no discussion on the template and given I could find nothing controversial about the article, I have removed it. Renee (talk) 19:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] link?
I've added several references, a table, and some information on esoteric astrology. I'm not sure if the external link is valid but have left it in. Renee (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)