Talk:Escondida

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:WP South America

I'm new to this game but I feel the entry could do with a more logical layout e.g. an introductory section, followed by history, then geology, reserves and resources, then the mine and its methods and finally a section on any other aspect of interest. Or does this sound too much like a technical report. I've got lots more information than is in the entry at the moment but I don't want to step on any toes. Any comments????? Mafestel (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

> I would say go for it, it can always be reduced or chaged. By now I think every bit of text you write is enhancing the article. 210.80.142.30 (talk) 23:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I've changed the whole thing, I hope for the best, and look forward to commentsMafestel (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Translation

Tazmaniacs, the Spanish original of the remark you are quoting is "Chile: Trabajadores de la mina de cobre Escondida demandan a la empresa" which means that the workers are making demands of the company. They are not "demanding the company" which I would say means that they are demanding ownership of the company and I can find no reference to this in anywhere. Maybe you have something that I have missed? Mafestel (talk) 18:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)