From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't believe there is enough information on them to justify having three separate pages for this. When clicking over to this article, I expected a brief summary of syntax, and had to travel to the eruby page to get it, which doesn't make sense. Also, the erb page is woefully inadequate, providing no information on even where to obtain it. Anyone object to the merger? RobinHP 22:43, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually, the poor grammar on all the pages is causing me to be bold. RobinHP 22:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Please go ahead and be very bold. These three articles suck really hard and they need lots of info. I also support a merge.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 12:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not just for embedding ruby in HTML files

Eruby can actually embed ruby in any text file, not just HTML. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.131.164 (talk) 17:17, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] no link to original doc, lines beginning with %

The article needs a link to the original docs for eruby, which I haven't had any luck finding. There is a man page, but it's not meant to be a complete source of documentation for eruby. There is a special syntax in eruby involving lines beginning with the % character, but I haven't been able to track down the documentation on it.--76.93.42.50 (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)