Talk:Ernst & Young
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| B | This article has been rated as b-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve tax-related articles to a feature-quality standard. |
| Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-priority on the Project's priority scale. |
 |
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's comments page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. |
HQ location There is some dispute over where EY's Global Headquarters are located. Some say New York, citing Hoovers reference [1] to the US Headquarters and the fact that the Global Chairman (who is also Chairman of the Americas) resides in NY.
Others say Ernst & Young Global Ltd is in London, citing the press releases section of http://www.ey.com and the fact that most of its Vice Chairs and EYG staff are based in London. User:razbox
The Raluca Stroescu case This is a very important case in Romania, with a lot media interest and with reactions from several political parties (Romanian and European). Should info about this case be included in the article ?
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Eylogo.gif
Image:Eylogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ford Rhodes Sidat Hyder - Proposed merge
I don't think that the Pakistan branch of E&Y deserves its own article, unless sources can be provided to show that it's notable in its own right. Tevildo 15:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ford Rhodes Sidat Hyder is not a branch of E&Y
FRSH is not a branch of E&Y. FRSH has its own legal identity and is a partnership firm. It "represents" E&Y in Pakistan and it is not as if FRSH is "OWNED" by E&Y.
To determine whether the FRSH is notable, one can google Ford Rhodes Sidat Hyder and see that it is quite notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahson Tariq (talk • contribs) 15:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC
- In that case, references for its notability should be added to its article, otherwise it's at very severe risk of deletion. Tevildo 22:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've removed the merge proposal and taken the other article to PROD instead. Tevildo 13:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Eylogo.gif
Image:Eylogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
