User talk:Eritain
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm surprised no one's greeted you yet, so here goes:
Welcome!
Hello, Eritain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Btw, your edit on Qur'an was correct, and thanks. - Mustafaa 00:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] 21 Ramadan
It's disputed because it clashes with another statement (That of Laylat al-Qadr) and contains no source. --Irishpunktom\talk 08:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Camouflage Peer Review
Hello, you once edited Camouflage. You might be interested to know, this article has been nominated for peer peer review. novacatz 03:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Origin of Threads content
The source is not copyrighted (specifically), and even if we assume a copyright, no rights are reserved. It merely needs to have a source attribution. •Jim62sch• 22:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Above assertions incorrect. Please direct further discussion to Talk:Threads#Plagiarism. eritain 02:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reply to a comment on User talk:Tourskin
Its only perchy when someone says its is. Besides, I'm not being hard nosed about anything. Sea birds do not live in water, nor are they adapted to. There's nothing wrong in my opinion with answering a criticism. And i don't think there's anything wrong with asking for a consensus or a vote. My argument is clear. I see no wrong in any of my actions, so please do not lecture me. I am not talking in anger here, so excuse me if it looks like it, I may be young, but I am a very mature person. Suspicious edits? I understand that Wikipedia is literally frightened of people who may edit a featured article for fear that it would get ruined. But changing a few words is not suspicious, unless its offensive, which it wasn't. It was a scentific discussion.
So unless this is a warning, good day to you sir, and leave me be. Tourskin 06:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2
I'm cool. I too believe in discussion, hence I took part in one. I look forward to an academic discussion with you. Tourskin 23:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
