User talk:ErinHowarth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please feel free to leave me a message.

Contents

[edit] Fanny Alger

I will make specific edits later --Trödel 21:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September Six

Here is my memory from the news reports in Utah:

  • Lynne Kanavel Whitesides - teaching doctrine contrary to the church
  • Avraham Gileadi -
  • Paul Toscano - can't remember - though his writings often challenge priesthood authority
  • Maxine Hanks - supposedly for writing Women and Authority: Re-emerging Mormon Feminism
  • Lavina Fielding Anderson -
  • D. Michael Quinn - --Trödel 23:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Footnotes

YW - you may want to use {{subst:reference}} (copy and paste the text) - it will automatically include the following text in the article:

== References ==
<!-- ----------------------------------------------------------
  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a 
  discussion of different citation methods and how to generate 
  footnotes using the <ref>, </ref> and  <reference /> tags
----------------------------------------------------------- -->
<div class="references-small">
<references />
</div>

The cite templates also (generally) use APA guidelines I believer rather than the Harvard style, just as an FYI. I use Citation templates as a guide --Trödel 12:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Merging with Articles

I have looked at the Blacks and the Priesthood, Blacks and the LDS Church, Blacks and Mormonism, Blacks and Whatever, and I commend you on your efforts to clean things up, so I hope you can get all these various articles merged into something more consise and reasonable. Good luck. Bytebear 19:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blacks and Mormonism references

I noticed that your newly entered references were reverted by Wrp103; I suspect because they were not in proper format. Could you please go back and renter the references properly; they are needed. Thanks, Storm Rider (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Academy Awards#New Awards

Link: Academy Awards#New Awards

Huh. I don't know how you did this! But when I just tried to remove the {{sprotected}} template from the Academy Awards page, it wouldn't let me, saying there was an external link to a blacklisted site in the article. I had a poke, and it turns out that suite101.com is blacklisted. Would it trouble you terribly to find different references for your info? Once again, I have no idea how the spam filter caught me, but not you :) Feel free to continue this discussion on Talk:Academy Awards. Cheers, – riana_dzasta 08:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mormonism and history merge proposal

Please weigh in on the merger proposal between History of the Latter Day Saint movement and Mormonism and history. I saw that you were a recent contributor of one of the pages in question, and thought you would be interested.--Descartes1979 (talk) 21:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:80th Academy Awards nominees and winners

Hello. I replied to several of your posts at the article's talk page: Talk:80th Academy Awards nominees and winners. Hopefully, I have answered your questions there. And, thanks for contributing to the discussions there. However, I do have an important question for you. Please reply at my Talk Page ... located here ----> User Talk:Joseph A. Spadaro ... so that I will be sure not to miss it. I am curious as to why, when you replied to my post, you went in and edited the words of my original posting? That's a big no-no, as far as I know. I had noticed that when you replied to my posts at the Talk Page for the Academy Awards 80th ceremony. I scanned through my own post ... to see exactly the point that I made that you were responding to. (So that I could respond back in an informed way.) So, I went back to review my own original post / my own original words. And I noticed some typo's and some changes / edits and some wording that differed from how I originally submitted the post. When I went in and looked at the edit log, it shows that you went in and edited my words. I was just confused by this ... and was curious why you would do that? As I said, that is a big no-no. Please remember that, after you make edits, the original poster's name is still "signed" to that post. So, it hardly seems fair, right, or even ethical to change someone's words (for reasons good, bad, or indifferent) ... but yet to keep the original signature on the newly edited post. I am very confused by these actions and I am wondering if you can clear up your motivation, intent, and objectives for me. Many thanks. Please reply at my Talk Page: User Talk:Joseph A. Spadaro. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 20:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Indus valley article

Hi - I see you have removed text from this article without leaving an edit summary. Could you please explain why you've done this as I don't understand what was wrong with it.--Doug Weller (talk) 07:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)