User talk:ErikNY

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1

Contents

[edit] Mark Simone

Thanks for your comments. I hope you'll help me in keeping an eye on the page, as vandals are reinserting PR and Advertising, as well as blanking the Talk Page at will. Eleemosynary 15:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Check out the Mark Simone Talk page for some telling comments by a particularly incensed vandal. It's good for a laugh. Cheers. Eleemosynary 07:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BenH

You are reciving this message because you have been involved in a dispute with BenH before. Due to some currently ongoing disputes with this user, I invite you to check out Wikipedia:Requests for comment/BenH. —Whomp [T] [C] 01:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

It's obvious BenH has no intention of responding to the RfC ... as someone who's had to fix at least two of his "edits," I'm under the assumption that he's under a community ban. Hoping to get it formalized. Would appreciate your support ...Blueboy96 21:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spotteddogsdotorg

I think everyone's favorite TV AFD nominator/puppetmaster is back. Look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Russell (second nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irv Weinstein. Kirjtc2 14:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I wonder if you might want to cast your eye over the bottom of User talk:Splash#More Sockpuppets. -Splash - tk 22:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My edits were meant to remove the non-factual entries

"It faces stiff competition from New York City classic rock station WAXQ, which is viewed by many as the superior station." does not belong in an "encylopedia".

Ratings on Long Island prove otherwise. Since you can't reprint the actual numbers, you could at least elude to the fact that the station is the highest rated Rock station on Long Island and has been for years.

WBAB is also not "known for" it's heavy play of Pink Floyd. I would say that it's known for its dedication to the Long Island community. I would like to see an entry highlighting the station's extensive charity and fundraising work.

Also, there is no ongoing investigation into the signal hijacking. That should be updated.

Please just make the entry unbiased. It's obvious that you are writing this with a bias towards Q. Your personal feelings could undermine the integrity of Wikipedia, if you're not careful.


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:B103.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:B103.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Might need to keep an eye on J10254g

I dont know whats up with this guy, but he hit up quite a few other pages of arenas and stadiums with made up nicknames, incorrect nicknames, or wrong names for arenas or stadiums. Figured I would say something to you since you had caught one of his edits, and I had to undo a few of his edits myself. Whammies Were Here 03:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:B103.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:B103.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)