User talk:EricJosepi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Eric

Are you ok? --LeCorrector 05:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Good question. PMHauge 07:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, that was useless and random EricJosepi 02:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Issues with the iPhone responded to by someone too chicken to sign their post!

How much is Linksys paying you?

Linksys isn't paying me anything. They were their first and as soon as Apple releases something with the same name (THE SAME NAME!) as an already existing Linksys product and suddenly, the iPhone loses it's article to a bunch of Mac Zealots. Also, sign your posts! EricJosepi 00:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Random Crap That Doesn't Matter Anymore

You made a note on my talk page saying I had no right to alter your IP talk page. I do not know which IP talk page you are talking about. Please leave a message on my talk page so I can better understand what you are talking about. -Brainyiscool 19:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I just found the talk page you are talking about. You are not allowed to remove warnings on your talk page. This is a Wikipedia rule. You are allowed to archive warnings on a separate page, which I encourage you to do if you do not wish to have them on your talk page, so long as they are linked to on your talk page. I have reverted your ip's talk page. --Brainyiscool 19:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Here's the deal... Get an ADMIN to muck with my page. You are not an admin and contrary to the way this encyclopedia is supposed to work... only a select few get to be admins. EricJosepi 20:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
You do not need to be an admin to help remove vandalism and warn users. Please refer to the article Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism, especially the first bullet in the "How to Help" section. --Brainyiscool 22:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] NPA

With regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mostafa Tabatabainejad: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Please note that comments left in edit summaries may also be regarded as personal attacks. --Strothra 15:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh Christ... you know... I didn't name names. It was off the cuff and maybe ill thought out but because it was not specified at one person i don't think this is a personal attack. Nice try though. I mean, you tried right?EricJosepi 16:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
That tag was placed giving only a cursory glance to the context of the edit - I only saw the edit summary as the article is in my watchlist. Either way, the policies on civility and Wikiquette still apply. --Strothra 17:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
As someone who was named, let me also suggest you please read WP:AGF Bwithh 17:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Tell you what, I just reviewed the article again, and you were not really adding anything when commenting on people's vote/delete posts. One thing that stood out was "It's not a crystal ball." I realize it was but since there has been a rise in Taser incidents and taser deaths and the high profile the case had, I felt it was important to include. The thing is though, your just kept supporting only the deletes and saying "it's not a crystal ball." It was annoying and hindered the discussion. EricJosepi 05:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)