Talk:Erik Truffaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Erik Truffaz is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Erik Truffaz article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, set up to organize and expand entries on jazz and related subgenres, as well as other related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).

"and as such an Epigone of Miles Davis."

Is this fair to say?
It seems every jazz trumpeter becomes compared to Miles Davis at some point, just as each saxophonist is sooner or later compared to John Coltrane. I find such criticisms tiresome, personally. Truffaz's trumpeting skills are very good and he makes some very avant-garde/fusion compositions. Compared to "smooth jazz" Miles of later years, Erik would seem to have surpassed him already. His album Saloua isn't exactly my cup of tea, but I can dig what he was going for. For a jazz artist of today, Truffaz is maturing with each release. If he would just stop with the vocals on tracks, the music would be much more mainstream jazz. {Mind meal 01:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)}

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ErikTruffaz.jpg

Image:ErikTruffaz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)