Talk:Erik Rhodes (porn star)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Dedication
Does he have an alias? I wasn't able to find his name credited for the Mandy Moore film "dedication" on IMDB, nor on the movie's website http://www.dedicationmovie.net/--Biggayallison (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Survived AfD
I've restored this article, minus the speedy tag, after realizing by reading the talk page that it survived an AfD process, the result of which was "keep". It doesn't seem to have much notability to me, but I respect the result of the process. Please note for the future that if it's desired to delete this article, deletion review is the only way possible. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is wrong... you can renominate for AFD whenever you want. It helps to have a new argument/evidence/reason for the AFD though. After 1.5 years there's really no way to review a close like this... a new AFD is just needed. --W.marsh 00:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Quite right, I was mistaken about the policy and should have chosen my words more carefully. Accounting4Taste:talk 01:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Penis size
How hung is he for the infobox, anybody know?CholgatalK! 07:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] personal life section needs to be reviewed and edited
the newly added personal life section needs to seriously be reviewed and edited. it is HIGHLY biased poorly written and is an obvious attempt at bashing another person. the statements made are obvious attacks on Rhodes character especially some of the more personal facts. while he did state his real name on his blog he purposely omitted his last name for a reason. on top of that whoever has edited the personal life section has made statements that lack validity and cannot be confirmed in the site beginning used as a reference. while Rhodes admits to becoming enraged and even having the police called during one of the arguments between himself and his former boyfriend. the statements of 'blood everywhere' and serious injury upon his former boyfriend are never stated within the blog entry being cited and are therefore libel and should seriously be edited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stellrmn (talk • contribs) 04:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. According to WP:BLP, poorly sourced and biased material should be deleted immediately. I have gone ahead and done just that, but don't feel shy about doing it yourself in the future. -Todd(Talk-Contribs) 11:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)