User talk:ErgoSum88
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
If you leave me a message, I will respond here so please:
|
| Archives |
|---|
Contents |
[edit] Monstrous adolescent
Hi! I was wondering if you could help with this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malkinann/Monstrous_adolescent
It needs you - check the discussion page. Thanks!
- Peach (talk) 07:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you need my help with. New sources? Copyediting? I checked the discussion page and all I found was an unsigned anonymous message from someone wondering how to link to this page from the Akira article, which I doubt is permitted since this is a userfied version of a deleted article. The problem seems to be the notability of this subject is debatable, and almost every search result for this term in google refers to Napier's book on the subject, which is the current article "monstrous adolescent" redirects to. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Impeach
Please be civil with your comments. Timneu22 (talk) 16:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest you read WP:CIVIL a little more thoroughly, perhaps you might also read Help:Edit summary to learn the appropriate uses of the edit summary box. My comments were entirely civil and were simply a response to yours. Your edit comment stated "this article should be deleted anyway" and I responded by saying "if you think this article should be deleted then nominate it instead of leaving snide edit comments". Please point out where I crossed the line between civility and barbarity. Edit comments are for summarizing the changes you made to an article, not for voicing your opinions on whether or not the article should be deleted. So please, next time, take it to the talk page instead of leaving snide edit comments (which btw, means your comment was uncivil). --ErgoSum88 (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- I called your comments snide (which was not a personal attack) and I was merely pointing out the obvious nature of your edit summary. If you're going to throw policy links at me and get all wikilawyerish then I am going to do the same. I will also point out the obvious hypocrisy behind your chastising my edit summary when yours was the one that was uncalled for. So next time think twice about treating an edit summary like a talk page because there is a difference between the two. You might want to try reading Help:Edit summary and Wikipedia:Talk page to learn what the difference is. Thank you and have a nice day. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 21:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Circle of Iron.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Circle of Iron.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] BP Pedestrian Bridge
I don't know if I should inform you about WP:CHIFTD. Please use {{Talkback}}.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm, well I'm assuming you want me to update this page when I give the results of the GA review. No problem, I'll take care of it. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 22:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sure you could do that. I have never done a WP:FTC so I am unsure when you are suppose to seek advice about unifying the theme. I guess I should wait until I get to that stage and let each article get evaluated.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I have resolved most of your concerns and have a query in at WT:BRIDGE about the mysterious handrails.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
