User talk:Erc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hello and welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message.

If you are starting a new conversation, please click on new section at the top of this page or this link.

If you are leaving a reply, please click [edit] next to the appropriate heading of the corresponding conversation.

While I do have wiki email, although I prefer user talk unless it is an important matter. I will read messages left on my page ASAP.

Please take note: As of March 29, 2008, I have had my user name changed from User:Hobbeslover to Erc (this talk page!). If you were looking for Hobbeslover (from which I edited from June 2004 until March 2008) you are in the right place.

Regardless of whether I contacted you or you contacted me, I will always respond to your messages on your talk page, not on mine. I will also copy and paste over the discussion onto your talk page to keep the flow of conversation. If you have no commenting preference, I encourage you to post on my talk page in your comments back to me. While I check the talk pages of anyone who I am having an active conversation with, I do like to have notice. Also, it makes my talk page seem more populated :)

Template:Archive box/box-width/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/image/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/image-width/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/auto/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/1/defined


Contents

[edit] Thanks

Hey, Thanks for the input. I think I have a much better understanding of how to approach editing on wiki now. I'll be more considerate in the future so that any confusion is avoided. I also found the specific talk pages for the articles where all the relevant dialogue is taking place so I now have a go-to point for editing consensus. Narchy (talk) 07:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool didn't notice you're at Rutgers. I've got some friends there (I used to live in Westfield, Union County), small world :p.
Narchy (talk) 09:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shinji

While I agree to removing the unofficial leader thing, Shinji is implied to be very powerful, as the vizards said something about Ichigo being unwise to battle Shinji. Plus, being a former captain and all, seeing as the vizard actually said something like that shows how powerful Shinji is. The measure in power is a valid point, and so I think it should be included.--Hanaichi 07:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Whoops, forgot about Ichigo not being serious either. My point is not about saying how awesome Shiji is, but rather to indicate some sort of his measure of power. However, despite Ichigo holding back due to the fear of his hollow surfacing, the later fight between Grimmjow and Shinji proves how powerful Shinji is, because Ichigo couldn't defeat Grimmjow until his power growth later but Shinji could blast Grimmjow out of the way with his cero. Its like the statement at Yamamoto, as he is "considered to be the strongest captain" and is "also able to fight on par with two of the most powerful captains" and the statements arent cited.--Hanaichi 07:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I agree. Cheers.--Hanaichi 07:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

Thanks for the warning, but you know you should look into the context a bit before slapping the silly templates around. It is really rather irritating. The reverts were repairing cut and paste moves that are clearly contrary to policy. Second, the moves, even if done properly, were controversial moves that have been the subject of extensive discussion in the past and should have gone through WP:RM and not simply implemented unilaterally. olderwiser 18:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tigrett

You made the right call. Feel free to revert any unsourced info. y'am'can (wtf?) 18:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shinigami (Bleach)

Hi, I didn't realize you were Hobbeslover. Congrats on the new username. I have sort of reverted one of your edits to the article, and replaced it with different wording. I would've probably acted differently if I realized that it was you, but I still think the current version is better. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 18:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I only reverted the second one, but as I said, I was hoping to replace it with more clear and concise wording (diff). I apologize if my edit offended you. Feel free to insert the wording of your choise if you think this one is not good. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 18:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Your userbox

Hi. I have moved your userbox from User Hn-N to User:Obaidz96/Userboxes/Hn-N. You have created this page incorrectly into main article space. I have requested User Hn-N to be deleted. Please see WP:Userboxes for the correct procedure on how to create a userbox. Thanks. erc talk/contribs 08:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I have just realized that you have multiple other incorrectly created userboxes - namely, User Hn-0, User Hn-1, User Hn-2, User Hn-3, User Hn-4, User Hn-5, and User Hn-6. I have moved or copied all of these pages back to your user space, where you will find them at User:Obaidz96/Userboxes/Hn-X where X is the number of the box. I have requested deletion for all of these templates. Feel free to create these templates in the appropriate manner. Thanks. erc talk/contribs 18:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Is it ok now? I don't want to violate any rules. --Obaidz96 (talk contribs count) 22:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Type Equivalence

I am not arguing that those are nicely written pages, but they feel to be lacking something that this page had. Furthermore, I feel that those pages are done in such a way that the information would be inappropriate in those locations.

Also, how are they not really what wikipedia is? I would like further information on this as you seem to know all about reverting pages back to previous states, and are some kind of college student, so you must know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitnickenizer (talkcontribs) 07:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)