Talk:Equalization
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of Wikipedia's Stagecraft coverage, and has come to the attention of WikiProject Stagecraft, an attempt to create a comprehensive and detailed resource on the art of stagecraft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (just like any other article!), or visit WikiProject Stagecraft, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Professional sound production WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the technology, equipment, companies and professions related to professional sound production. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
Equalizer
Contents |
[edit] types of equalizers
I think that there needs to be some serious editing on the overview. and to move the classifications of an equalizer into other catergories.
here is a suggestion:
The classifications of an equalizer are determined by the method it changes the tone and it's functionality.
tone control methods
- shelving
- passing
- peaking
- cut and boost
functionality
- sweeping
- parametric
- graphic
- paragraphic
Ab2kgj 03:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] misc
Could someone please give a technical overview of why nine-band equalizers are better for tweaking speakers than non-multiples-of-three band equalizers? Electrosoccertux 03:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
There is nothing magical about a multiple-of-three bad equalizer. Indeed, there is nothing special about nine-band equalizers. Most pros use a graphic eq with at least 30 bands. --Pjvpjv 12:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
there are two possible reasons : multiples of three fit more closely with the fact that music is arranged in octaves. or most likely that the internal components are more suited to a multiple of three arrangement.
[edit] history to add
- something about Baxendall
- something about George Massenburg [1]
Iain 01:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
I agree to merge with equalization filter.--Lenilucho 19:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I vote to keep the articles seperate. This one should discuss the piece of audio equipment while the other should ultimately be expanded to include an explination of various digital algo's and analog circuits to actually do the work. The other should be linked to in this article. 48v 03:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong Link
the link for high pass links to a Lord of the Rings ArticleTjb891 16:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- I fixed it and the rest of the filter's links.--Lenilucho 18:44, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sense
Does "In passing through any channel, data is temporal/frequency spreading occurs. " make sense? --82.25.174.136 19:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
