Talk:Epigynous berry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Epigynous berry is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a quality rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Rename

This page has been renamed Epigynous berry from False berry. All previous talk was concerned with confusion over the old name rather than about the substance of the article. Old talk has been archived here Talk:Epigynous berry/old title.Meggar 02:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The chart here conflicts with the chart on Berry - notably, there Banana is a common berry / true berry, but here it's a common non-berry / false berry. 14:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Plain language addition needed

As it stands this article is a fairly useless technical stub. After looking it over, I have no idea what the difference is between a true and false berry. It needs a big addition by someone who really understands the concept and also understands the needs of an ordinary reader. -69.87.203.227 14:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Useless technical stub indeed. I'm a botanist, and I've never heard the term "false berry" before. I understand what an epigynous berry is, but I'm not sure how to put it in any plainer language than is already in the article. At any rate, this is NOT a distinction most botanists would bother with (I looked through 5 floras I had at hand, all of which described Vaccinium fruits (blueberries) as "berries"). I'm bothered by the fruit types table at the bottom. This basically only has "layman's" fruits. No capsules, siliques, legumes, etc. I'm hesitant to edit the table myself, since I'm not sure how exhaustively fruit types should be listed.63.78.97.2 17:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)