Talk:Epigraph (mathematics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
|||||
| Mathematics rating: | Stub Class | Low Priority | Field: Analysis | ||
| Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Please also add comments to suggest improvements to the article. | |||||
[edit] Citation Mechanics
JA: It's like this. Mathematicians have traditionally been far more sensible in their citation practices than just about anybody around, and I would hope that we could keep it that way in WP. Templates and Refbots of various species are neither required nor recommended in WP, and those who have had some experience with them can tell you that they are just not worth the pain in the eyes, and moreover lead to information degradation over time. Jon Awbrey 13:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, I apparently missed the recent discussion on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#Citation_Templates. The way I remembered it, the use of citation templates was explicitly recommended. — Tobias Bergemann 13:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
