Talk:Epicure (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Epicure (band) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
Wasn't the second single from the Hottest 100 "Life Sentence"? Ambi 13:15, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, it was. I noticed I made this mistake yesterday but forgot to change it! -- Chuq 22:05, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Move?
Can this article move to Epicure (band), with a redirect from Epicure (disambiguation), so that Epicure can have its normal meaning of "an Epicurean, a follower of Epicurus and lover of all the sensual pleasures". It's an important cultural bit in the History of ideas.--Wetman 23:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Makes sense - it's silly to have this at Epicure. Ambi 23:43, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Since you're one of the originators, Ambi, sounds like a Go. I'll do the Move. --Wetman 02:41, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- My apologies - I just changed it back, without reading this page first. However I'll explain my reasoning - all links to Epicure refer to the band. I have edited Epicure to include a link at the top to Epicureanism. Other options IMO:
- Same as before, but have a link up the top of Epicureanism to Epicure (band)
- Same as before, but with Epicure as a redirect to the two pages, instead of a redirect to Epicureanism.
- -- Chuq 06:57, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- My apologies - I just changed it back, without reading this page first. However I'll explain my reasoning - all links to Epicure refer to the band. I have edited Epicure to include a link at the top to Epicureanism. Other options IMO:
- You can't imagine how disconcerting it is, entering Epicure at Wikipedia, to be informed that "Epicure are a Australian rock band from Ballarat, in regional Victoria." It probably catches the true Wikipedia flavor nevertheless. --Wetman 07:13, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- It's absurd, and I've fixed the problem. Epicure should redirect to Epicureanism. --Viriditas 04:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Epicure.jpg
Image:Epicure.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
