User talk:Enviroboy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is the place to contact Enviroboy. Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). New sections go at the bottom of the page. To start a new section, create a ==new heading== or simply click here. Thanks. |
 Archives |
Contents |
[edit] Sorry
I um.. was looking at your ten thousandth edit... and I kinda reverted it... I didn't mean to, I didn't know what I was doing, so could you like... fix that? I truly am sorry, since I know that must have been big for you. Anything to ask or say to me, just stick it on my talk page. WhiteFox (talk) 04:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Lol. It was not "big for me" - it was nearly-mindless cleanup/maintenance. Besides, reverting it does not change the fact that it's there. If your revert was a mistake, you should just undo it. EnviroboyTalkCs 04:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I'm glad you didn't get mad at me, but I wasn't expecting it either. You're just too professional and nice. WhiteFox (talk) 04:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh and by the way, you can call me Whitefox. WhiteFox (talk) 05:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
One more thing. Where do I get userboxes, and hox do I build userbox towers? WhiteFox (talk) 05:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- See WP:Userboxes. That page contains all the instructions as well as links to the various galleries. There are a few templates for the towers, you will need to put the userboxes within those templates (between {{Userboxtop}} and {{Userboxbottom}} for example). You could also use tables but that's a bit more complicated and does not look as nice. Like I said, all the instructions are there. EnviroboyTalkCs 06:04, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, you've been really helpful. I'm off to go get some userboxes! WhiteFox (talk) 06:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
You've been so nice, you deserve a cookie.
WhiteFox (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
 |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| You deserve this. You mindlessly and tirelessly work to improve Wikipedia, and you perform so many boring, repetitive tasks, all day every day. WhiteFox (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] Hi
LOL. I've been patrolling recent changes lately, and the disambiguation page for mohawk has been vandalized a lot. Seriously, I had to undo two vandals in a row! as in within a few seconds of each other! WhiteFox (talk) 02:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
They were the same person. WhiteFox (talk) 02:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My bad
I thought that cause it was my talk page i could write about myself for other users to see. So dont worry about i wont do it again. You can trust me I'm da biggest italiano period, plain and simple. ight yo 1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by DA biGgEsT iTaLiAnOoO (talk • contribs) 02:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Enviroboy
No need for block. I didn't do anything wrong. I just edited UNVERIFIED/UNRELIABLE information. Citing a reference from a newspaper isn't reliable at all. It's a third hand information for god's sake! And you have the guts to call that reliable???!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duck You (talk • contribs) 06:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Enviroboy
I was trying to reverse the vandalism made by 68.32.1.62 and 96.3.154.129, however I am new to the undo feature, I have never used it prior to this. After I saw it did essentially nothing I reversed the edits manually, as seen in my most recent edit to the article, which seemed to occur at the exact same time as yours.
Sorry for the mixup! --ToyoWolf (talk) 23:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- I know. I realized that afterwards so I undid my revert. Sorry for the confusion; I already struck out the message on your talk page. EnviroboyTalkCs 23:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Haha, I just saw that, no worries. ^_^ --ToyoWolf (talk) 23:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
I'm afraid I'm unclear as to what constitutes vandalism. I was under the impression that information must be sourced, which is what I'm doing, not vandalising. Little help?
--NewsEditor1000 (talk) 08:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I'm putting my sourced info back on. Could you kindly retract your warnings from my discussion page? --NewsEditor1000 (talk) 08:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
No harm, no foul! As for unsourced info, do any remedies exist short of what amounts to blanking a page if nearly an entire entry is unsourced? Thanks!
--NewsEditor1000 (talk) 08:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Help with Finland's Top Model page Suomen huippumalli haussa
Hi perhaps you can help with this. Apparently user Akalucas has repeatedly vandalised various Top Model pages. This user violated the call out order section of Suomen huippumallihaussa (Revision as of 06:30, 15 May 2008) and Shameless and I tried to undo the damage, but it is locked (message: The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits.) Please help undo this vandalism. Best Leopea (talk) 06:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Hi! Thanks for the response. No worries about the time difference (that is, if you're outside of GMT+2 time) :-) Yeah, I figured it out and did some rework on it. I don't understand why people do what they do sometimes, but I guess that's life here on the World Wide Web! Thanks again and best regards Leopea (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism?
Hi, I've been notified that my edits constitute vandalism and that I'll be banned if I keep it up. I respect the rules of Wikipedia, but this is confusing me, what exactly constitutes vandalism? I looked up the Wikipedia link, and this is what it said:
"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, or the insertion of nonsense into articles."
I'm not at all trying to compromise the integrity and there was definitely no obscenity, crude humor, page blanking or nonsense in my edit. Did I leave out an important step in my edit or something?
Thanks for all your help! I really appreciate your efforts. Remilyp90 (talk) 06:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Your edits to Colt 45 are vandalism because you posted blatant, unsourced attacks against individuals from (what I assume to be) your high school and named names. Please see Wikipedia's policies on neutrality, and biographies of living persons. Your repeated posting of attacks violates those policies. As I said on your talk page, if you repost the attacks, you will be blocked from editing. EnviroboyTalkCs 06:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New contributor: Art Therapy
Thanks for your message: really helpful and I've started on reading the articles you linked. But I couldn't find the question you said you'd left on the art therapy article talk page! This is whole, quite mind bending, world in here: fascinating, great, potentially very time consuming! --Malcolmmax (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
