Talk:Entrapment (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Southeast Asian cinema task force

Complaints also arose from Malaysia, with some claiming that the movie depicted Malaysia as a backwards country, and was factually inaccurate.

Why did they feel offended? Don't they say that Malaysia is a socalled "Country with first world infrastructure and third world mentality" ?. 82.156.162.229 5 July 2005 11:58 (UTC)

If someone were to make a movie about assasinating your Prime Minister/President and portray your country in a bad light, assuming you have a some sense of patrotism, would you like this kind of movie? --Andylkl ^(talk) July 9, 2005 11:32 (UTC)

I'm confused about the assasinating of the prime minster. Where in the movie do they say anything about this? The only movie in recent times that I can think of that did that was Zoolander, which should rightly be banned (IMHO). Also, from above, please clarify who "they" is. Who says Malaysia is a "Country...". Was this from the movie or from some other source relevant to this article?

I'm terribly embarrased to say this, but I had somehow got the plot for this movie confused with Zoolander. --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 15:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I am proud to say that I spent the last hour researching Catherine Zeta-Jones' laser security net rump scene. --Psients 07:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Me too, but it took me 30 seconds with the help of youtube.

[edit] Too Much Butt

This is an embarassment. The article spends a few lines talking about the movie's plot and just about the rest of the article talking about Catherine Zeta-Jones's butt. How about some class? This is certainly not something that should be found in an encyclopedia. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 20:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree. The article is an absolute disgrace, and hardly encyclopaedic. Someone needs to fix it up quick-smart. I elliot 10:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I have decided to be bold and remove the entire segment altogether. A passing comment about it should be sufficient, but this is overkill to be honest. --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 15:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I added a much briefer "Critical reaction" section. I think it should be mentioned, as that's just about all anyone remembers from the film. Alanhwiki 23:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Someone should have researched what the critics really said. They loved it. Also I think it's time this section about Malaysia not liking the movie be brought down. There is no citation and at this point with all the rest of this stupid article out there it's starting to constitute libel. Is this the pervert from eFilmCritic trying to get everybody to agree with him? Does he have it in for Sean Connery? Or Jon Amiel? Clearly this was planned defamation. Disgraceful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.5.12.208 (talk) 19:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Needs a Spoiler tag! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.84.121.155 (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Entrapment film.jpg

Image:Entrapment film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

About the critic of Weinberg: "With a dazzling performance, Catherine Zeta-Jones dominates the picture with absolute assurance and a bewitching smile." The same page. Critic of Steven Rhodes. Why just one critic is quoted? 201.255.43.23 (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Plot Synopsis

Hey, how about a plot synopsis? At least some blurb like from the back of the DVD case. SuperChencho (talk) 00:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)