Talk:Enrique Iglesias

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.

Spain Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

1 I find lots of this as being dealing in mere trivialities!
2 Citizenship
3 Label Change
4 Fair use rationale for Image:Cosas.JPG
5 Fair use rationale for Image:Escape.jpg
6 Fair use rationale for Image:Enriqueseven.JPG
7 Fair use rationale for Image:Enriqueig.JPG
8 Fair use rationale for Image:Enrique.JPG
9 Fair use rationale for Image:Quizas.jpg
10 How come on much music he said i'm 46 but here it says hes 32
11 Pre-GAN Comments
12 Quick-failed GA nomination
13 Too full of bias and trivia.
14 origin
15 Original research
16 New Single?

[edit] I find lots of this as being dealing in mere trivialities!

A small minority of Filipinos are also Latinos (people of Spanish descent), and so, it is unscientific to argue about whether they are or they are not. It is a fact that the Philippines were a Spanish colony for centuries. It is also true that for a long time, the Philippines where not ruled directly from Spain, but rather via the Spanish Viceroy in MEXICO, or all places. The Spanish made lots of trans-Pacific voyages to maintain contact and trade between Mexico and the Philippines.

It is also notable that there is a sprinkling of Spanish words in the Filipino national language (such as the word for "ice"), but there are far more English words in it, from the American influences. The US took a much more active role in the Philippines, with the active goal of preparing the Philippines for independence, which was established on July 4, 1946, a date that had been promised well-before even the Japanese occupation of 1942-45. The Philippines and the USA agreed that the original plan could be carried through on schedule, in spite of that interruption in progress.

People who argue about his citizenship obviously do not understand the BIG difference between a U.S. Permanent Resident (i.e. a holder of a so-called "green card") and a U.S. citizen. Also, someone can be a Permanent Resident who is applying for U.S. citizenship, or a Permanent Resident who intendends to hold that status indefinitely, e.g. until the end of his/her life, and to remain a citizen of another country forever. Both of these are quite allowed under the laws of the United States of America.

I also find it foolish to discuss whom he does or does not date, becasue that is his own personal business. When he marries someone, that becomes a public, legal fact.

==Enrique's mother is not a Spanish Mestiza. She is a Filipina. ===I agree, she is not technically a mestiza because according to her website, because her father is only a filipino. and her mother is of malay descent.

Changed 'married to' in 'currently dates' since this is a gossip rumor. It is not confirmed that Enrique married Anna Kournikova.

Enrique is a Hispano Filipino not a American Filipino! (And he is NOT a Latino (-;)

I actualy agree with you that Enrique is not Latino. He is from Spain and Spain is not a Latin-American country. Most people however mistakenly view Spanish people as being "Latino" including Enrique himself in recent years. Rather than rock the boat I think it'd be best to just keep his desription as being Latin. (Someone would come change it back anyway.) Besides Enrique is far more popular in Latin America than he is or ever will be in Spain and arguebly spent more time in South and Middle America, plus he often used to say he considered himself to be more Mexican than Spanish.

Somebody ask about his passport, because I think it's Spanish rather than American, regardless of where he lives. (If you keep the bread in the garage, does it become a car?)

Enrique is a legal US resident. (Despite claiming otherwise in a few interviews). He's legaly lived in the US since he was six years old. After he returned to the States after recording his first album in Canada there was some trouble at the border. It was all sorted out and his passport was supposedly been said to have been a US one. [This is questionable]

A legal resident of any country does not carry a passport of that country, as this would mean he is a citizen of the country, and therefore no longer merely a "permanent" legal resident, but rather, and actual citizen of that country.

How is the relationship from Enrique Iglesias to the Philippines?

--Intramuros 14:39, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

His mother, Isabel Preysler, is from the Phillipines, although she has lived in Spain for a very long time. She's noted for marrying well and Ferrero Rocher chocolate adverts.

Should Enrique's genre be changed to just read "Pop"? I don't want to sound strange but does Enrique's music really qualify as latin? His first three Spanish albums were simply pop albums sang in Spanish. Ironicaly Enrique first started incorporating some latin styles on his first English album but it was still mostly what most would describe as pop. He also included some more traditional latin sounds on some of the songs from Quizas but again it was still mostly pop.

Just because Enrique is Spanish and has dabbled in Latin music does it make him a Latin artist? After all, Whitney Houston has recorded some Gospel songs but is she then classed as a Gospel singer?

[edit] Citizenship

What is the proof that he is a U.S. citizen?? Ciociabasia 21:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

That question is what drew me here and it has not been answered. Is this hottie an American or not?????--69.37.3.59 20:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I remember him saying in one interview that he has working-visa, so he actually isn`t American citizen

[edit] Label Change

Has Iglesias changed to Geffen Records? His offical site has a Geffen logo, and he is on the offical Geffen Records site. Has he changed? User:Beagle5589 4:09 P.M., August 14, 2006.

It's not a label change per se, Geffen is part of the Universal Music Group and is owned by Interscope. For a while it was dissolved completely into Interscope but for various business reasons now acts more independently from Interscope. So I guess we can either leave it as Interscope or change it Geffen (or put something like Interscope/Geffen). - 2006 82.42.209.144 03:55, 3 December 2006

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cosas.JPG

Image:Cosas.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Escape.jpg

Image:Escape.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Enriqueseven.JPG

Image:Enriqueseven.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Enriqueig.JPG

Image:Enriqueig.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Enrique.JPG

Image:Enrique.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Quizas.jpg

Image:Quizas.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

[edit] How come on much music he said i'm 46 but here it says hes 32

maybe someone changed it on here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xmarax (talk • contribs) 21:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

He is always joking... He really is 32 ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.250.118.252 (talk) 10:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pre-GAN Comments

This article is currently a GA nominee. However, what will inhibit this article to getting GA status is due to no references; only external links. Please provide sources before any official reviewers will come to your way and might fail this one. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 09:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quick-failed GA nomination

First, please note that the GA nomination was not completed, as the {{GAnominee}} template was not placed on this talk page. It was however, nominated at the nominations page. Any article that has "a complete lack of reliable sources" must be failed immediately and does not require an in-depth review, according to the quick-fail criteria of GA. The GA criteria unequivocally requires that nominated articles maintain good standards of verifiability, and provide,

"...references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout" and "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons"

Not only does this article lack inline citations, it has no references to reliable sources. References should be laid out in a separate section, and citations to these references provided where necessary. The lack of source material is especially unconscionable considering that it is the biography of a living person. Please provide references according to the guidelines of WP:V and WP:RS and carefully review the GA criteria before choosing to renominate the article. If you feel the result of this review was in error, you may request a reassessment. Thanks for your work so far, VanTucky ^talk 19:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Also I removed GA templates to reflect that this article has not yet been through the proper process. David Pro (talk) 15:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Too full of bias and trivia.

I find this article too full of unnecessary bias and trivias that do not contribute to a real encyclopedic content under wikipedia standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.11.38.122 (talk) 07:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This article is missing more information there is more to enriques life.

[edit] origin

Miami, Florida, United States. this is not his origin, just where he lives now, he is spanish Filipino I thought.. Reaper7 (talk) 11:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Original research

The article asserts:
This album's production year is mistakenly listed as 1998 by iTunes and Window Media Information (via Windows Media Player). This can easily be seen by going to iTunes and searching for the album or playback of the physical CD on either iTunes or Windows Media Player. The mistaken production year was most likely inserted as 1998 due to the fact that this was the year Enrique Iglesias was signed by Universal who bought out all his projects from Fonovisa, now known as Univision Records and re-released all his prior albums under the Universal label.
Paragraph has been omitted. Oskarg956 (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New Single?

Supposedly Enrique has released/will release a new single off the re-release of Insomniac. I see no mention of said re-release on this page or Insomniac's page, but here's a link to the single: http://jayosflows.blogspot.com/2008/05/can-you-hear-him_17.html

And if someone could track down some citeable info about the re-release... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.144.214 (talk) 02:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)