User talk:Enquire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Howdy, Enquire, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.


[edit] Additional tips

Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

[edit] Be bold

Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own user or user talk page.
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

 Joe  I 06:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Smart

Smart (automobile) and Smart fortwo are not duplicates. The fortwo is the car smart is best known for, among others. Also, be sure to add new comments to the bottom of talk pages and sign your posts with ~~~~. Thanks, Reywas92TalkHow's my editing? 15:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Google Apps

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Google Apps are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Thank you. GreenJoe 23:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC) What is your point? I have made no comments on Talk:Google Apps.

[edit] Macca

Hi,

Two points:

  1. Of the studies you added to the page, one was a link that didn't go to anywhere specific, and the second was already found in the text as an in-line citation
  2. It's not a good idea to dump raw information or sources on a page like that. Information should be in a summary style rather than raw links. However, you could have added information like that to the talk page with a suggestion that it be integrated as sources. The point's a bit moot since the pubmed link was already in the page, but for the future, that's a better spot to put it.

Thanks, WLU 19:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Vancouver Aquatic Centre

I have nominated Vancouver Aquatic Centre, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vancouver Aquatic Centre. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Travellingcari (talk) 02:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mecca watch

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mecca watch, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BpEps - t@lk 07:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)