User talk:Enigma00

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My Talk Page.

Contents

[edit] Image:Octavarium.jpg

Hello Enigma00, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Octavarium.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Enigma00/octavarium. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Realschule Wittgenstein photograph

Dear Brendon, drop me a line at kimberley.cornish@arts.monash.edu.au should you want further information about Wittgenstein and Hitler. Wittgenstein really is the other boy in the photograph. A number of other confirming matters about the theses of "The Jew of Linz" have emerged since publication, but cannot be used in Wikipedia because they are as yet unpublished. On the other hand, you are quite right that encyclopedias ought to be conservativeKimberley Cornish 03:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

It's now two months since you tagged "The Jew of Linz" article with warning messages. You were asked in the article's discussion page to list the first of the items that you considered required revision so that the issue could be assessed. Since nothing has been provided as an example of anything requiring revision, it might be time to either remove the tags or else state which of the article's theses you consider to be biased.Kimberley Cornish 21:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
This is just a reminder to either itemise your concerns about the article on "The Jew of Linz" in the article's discussion pages or else to remove the deprecating tag you placed there. Your co-operation in resolving this matter quickly would be greatly appreciated.Kimberley Cornish 00:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Just for the record: you write on the discussion page of "The Jew of Linz" "I don't mind that you removed my tag". In fact I didn't remove your tag.Kimberley Cornish 20:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Wittgenstein Page

Thanks for the kind words! :-) It seems that our areas of interest overlap quite a bit -- I look forward to working with you more in the future. — xDanielx T/C\R 06:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mill in Parliament

Greetings Enigma00. What is your source for Mill as representing the Liberal rather than Radical interest (granting that the latter often cooperated with the former as Mill did)? P. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madame Pratolungo (talkcontribs) 20:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)