Engagements on Lake Ontario
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Engagements on Lake Ontario encompass the prolonged naval contest for control of the lake during the War of 1812. Few actions were fought, none of which had decisive results, and the contest essentially became a naval building race, sometimes referred to sarcastically as the "Battle of the Carpenters".
Contents |
[edit] Background
When war was first declared, the British had an early advantage on the Great Lakes in that they possessed a quasi-naval body, the Provincial Marine. Although not particularly well-manned or efficient, its ships were initially unopposed on Lake Erie and Lake Huron, and made possible the decisive early victories of Major General Isaac Brock. On Lake Ontario, they possessed the ships Royal George and Prince Regent, the brigs Earl of Moira and Duke of Gloucester, and the schooners Seneca and Simcoe, under the eighty-year old Commodore Hugh Earle.[1]. The Americans possessed only one brig, the Oneida under Lieutenant Melancthon Taylor Woolsey, and a small navy yard at Sackets Harbor, New York. On July 19, five vessels of the Provincial Marine attacked Oneida outside Sackets Harbor but were beaten off.
To redress matters, the United States Navy appointed Commodore Isaac Chauncey, then commanding the navy yard in New York, to command on the lakes on September 3, 1812. Although Chauncey was nominally in charge of the forces on Lake Erie also, he took no part in its construction or operations there but concentrated his attention on Lake Ontario. His first ships were hastily purchased or commandeered trading vessels, but he despatched large numbers of carpenters, shipwrights and so on to Sacket's Harbor to construct proper fighting ships. The chief architects were Adam Brown, his brother Noah and Henry Eckford. They launched the first ship, the corvette Madison, on November 26. The trees from which it was constructed had still been standing in September.[2]
Chauncey hoisted his broad pendant on November 6 and pursued the British ship Royal George into Kingston, Ontario. He too was beaten off, partly by shore batteries and gunboats, and partly because a gun exploded aboard the schooner Pert, throwing the American squadron into confusion. At this point winter closed in, immobilising the ships of both sides in port.
[edit] Operations in 1813
Chauncey had gained an advantage over the winter with a rapid building program. He and General Henry Dearborn had the opportunity to strike a blow before the British could catch up. An attack on Kingston would have been decisive, but Chauncey and Dearborn persuaded themselves that it was defended by 5,000 British regulars (there were in fact only 600). They instead attacked York, defeating the outnumbered defenders under Major General Roger Hale Sheaffe and looting the town. They captured the brig Duke of Gloucester and also several cannon which were destined for the British squadron on Lake Erie, (which contributed to the later American victory at the Battle of Lake Erie). The British themselves set fire to the ship Isaac Brock which was still being built, to prevent it falling into American hands.
Chauncey and Dearborn then defeated the British army at the Battle of Fort George. At both York and Fort George, Chauncey's schooners and gunboats (commanded at the latter engagement by Oliver Hazard Perry) had proved very effective in supporting troops landing from boats. Dearborn and Chauncey had nevertheless left themselves vulnerable to a devastating counter-attack. While they were preoccupied at the western end of Lake Ontario, Commodore James Lucas Yeo had arrived in Kingston to take charge of the British squadron. Embarking troops under the British Commander-in-Chief in Canada, Lieutenant General Sir George Prevost, he almost immediately attacked the American base at the Battle of Sackett's Harbor. Although this was a strategically bold stroke, both Yeo and Prevost attacked cautiously and called off the attack when they met with stiff resistance. The Americans had prematurely set fire to the captured Duke of Gloucester and a ship under construction, the General Pike, but managed to put out the fire when the British withdrew. The Gloucester and large quantities of stores were destroyed, but the Pike was saved.[3]
While Chauncey was in harbour awaiting the completion of the Pike, Yeo's squadron assisted in driving the American army on the Niagara peninsula back into Fort George, and captured or destroyed large quantities of stores.
Chauncey's full squadron put out on July 21. They first contemplated an assault on the British defensive positions at Burlington Heights, but found the defenders too well-prepared to risk the operation, and instead they briefly captured York again, this time causing little loss.[4] On August 7, they encountered Yeo near Fort Niagara, but the two squadrons spent several days in cautious manoevres. Chauncey had an advantage in long guns and waited for calm conditions in which he could engage at long range, while Yeo had the advantage in carronades and wanted to close in heavy weather. On August 8, two American schooners (the Hamilton and Scourge) capsized and sank in a sudden squall. On August 10, Chauncey was caught out by a shift in the wind, and two more American schooners, the Growler and Julia were captured.[5]
Both squadrons withdrew to their bases for provision. On August 11, there was an indecisive long-range skirmish off the Genesee River at the western end of the Lake.[6]. On August 28, the two squadrons met again in York Bay. This time, the Pike's long guns came fully into action, partly dismasting Yeo's flagship, the Wolfe. Yeo ran before the wind into Burlington Bay. (The Americans later referred to the action as the "Burlington Races".) Chauncey declined to follow Yeo over the sandbar at the entrance to the bay. He might have destroyed Yeo's squadron but feared that he himself would be trapped on a hostile lee shore and destroyed if the wind strengthened.[7]
Nevertheless, while Yeo was able to make hasty repairs before retiring to Kingston, Chauncey effectively controlled the lake. Over the next months, his ships captured five small British schooners and other sail (including Growler and Julia) which were moving supplies or soldiers westward. Their control of the lake allowed the Americans to move their troops from Fort George to Sacket's Harbour in preparation for their attack on Montreal late that year. Although Chauncey was supposed to blockade the British in Kingston and prevent them interfering, an effective blockade was difficult in the foul weather of late autumn, and amidst the many islets at the mouth of the Saint Lawrence River. This allowed a British force to pursue the American army of James Wilkinson and defeat them at the Battle of Crysler's Farm.[8]
[edit] Vessels on Lake Ontario in 1813
The following table should not be treated as an authentic list of fighting vessels. Both sides (especially the British) renamed, re-rigged and re-armed their ships several times during the war. Both sides also possessed several unarmed schooners or other small vessels for use as transports or tenders.[9]
Nationality | Name | Type | Tonnage | Crew | Armament | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | General Pike | sloop | 875 | 300 | 28 long 24-pdr | |
" | Madison | corvette | 593 | 200 | 28 32-pdr carronade | |
" | Oneida | brig | 243 | 100 | 16 24-pdr carronade | |
" | Hamilton | schooner | 112 | 50 | 1 long 32-pdr 1 long 24-pdr 8 long 6-pdr |
sunk in squall |
" | Scourge | schooner | 110 | 50 | 1 long 32-pdr 8 12-pdr carronade |
sunk in squall |
" | Conquest | schooner | 82 | 40 | 1 long 32-pdr 1 long 12-pdr 4 long 6-pdr |
|
" | Tompkins | schooner | 96 | 40 | 1 long 32-pdr 1 long 12-pdr 4 long 6-pdr |
|
" | Julia | schooner | 82 | 35 | 1 long 32-pdr 1 long 12-pdr |
captured & recaptured |
" | Growler | schooner | 81 | 35 | 1 long 32-pdr 1 long 12-pdr |
captured & recaptured |
" | Ontario | schooner | 53 | 35 | 1 long 32-pdr 1 long 12-pdr |
|
" | Fair American | schooner | 53 | 30 | 1 long 24-pdr 1 long 12-pdr |
|
" | Pert | schooner | 50 | 25 | 1 long 24-pdr | |
" | Asp | schooner | 57 | 25 | 1 long 24-pdr | |
" | Lady of the Lake | schooner | 89 | 15 | 1 long 9-pdr | Said to be "very sharp" Used as despatch vessel |
Britain | Wolfe | sloop | 637 | 220 | 1 long 24-pdr 8 long 18-pdr 4 68-pdr carronade 10 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Isaac Brock | sloop | 637 | unknown | unknown | unfinished, burned on stocks |
" | Royal George | sloop | 510 | 200 | 3 long 18-pdr 2 68-pdr carronade 16 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Lord Melville | brig | 279 | 100 | 2 long 18-pdr 12 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Moira | brig | 262 | 100 | 2 long 9-pdr 12 24-pdr carronade |
|
" | Duke of Gloucester | brig | unknown | unknown | "10 guns" | captured; subsequently burned |
" | Beresford | schooner | 216 | 80 | 2 long 12-pdr 10 32-pdr carronade |
formerly the ship-rigged Prince Regent |
" | Sidney Smith | schooner | 187 | 70 | 1 long 12-pdr 1 long 9-pdr 6 18-pdr carronade |
formerly named Simcoe |
Note: another British schooner of similar tonnage and armament to Simcoe, the Seneca, was part of the Provincial Marine in 1812 but does not appear to have been used as a warship in 1813 and 1814.
[edit] Operations in 1814
Over the winter of 1813-14, Yeo had been feverishly building two big frigates (HMS Prince Regent and HMS Princess Charlotte), and held the initial advantage. He began the year with the Raid on Fort Oswego, to cut the supply line to Sacket's Harbor. The raid was partially successful, and the schooner Growler changed hands for the third time.[10]
Yeo's main aim had been to capture guns intended for Chauncey's own new frigates, but most of these had still been twelve miles up the Oswego River, where Yeo could not reach them. He established a blockade to prevent these reaching Sacket's Harbor. A few weeks later, Lieutenant Woolsey nevertheless tried to take several boats loaded with cannon for Chauncey's new ships to Sacket's Harbor but was driven into a creek a few miles south of the base. Yeo sent a party of marines and sailors to "cut out" the American boats, but they were ambushed and all killed or captured at the Battle of Big Sandy Creek.
Shortly after this, Chauncey received his guns and put out in two frigates (the Superior and Mohawk) even larger than Yeo's, and Yeo retired into Kingston. The pattern for the year was set; whichever flotilla had a fleeting disadvantage in ships or guns stayed in harbour until they had built something bigger.
The Americans temporarily controlled the lake and succeeded in destroying a 10-gun brig under construction at Presque Isle before it could be launched, and also the British brig Magnet (whose crew ran her aground and set fire to her to prevent her capture). However, Chauncey concentrated on "blockading" Kingston and was criticised by General Jacob Brown and other army commanders for his failure to prevent the British reinforcing and maintaining their troops in the Niagara peninsula, which contributed to the indecisive result of the campaign there.[11]
On October 15, Yeo put out in the three-decked ship of the line Saint Lawrence, dominating the Lake until November 21, when winter set in. This was the winning stroke. Although the Americans at Sacket's Harbor immediately laid down an even larger ship of the line, British construction over the winter of 1814-15 matched American attempts to regain the lead. (The Americans had earlier diverted some resources to Lake Champlain, which allowed them to win the decisive Battle of Plattsburgh.)
[edit] Vessels on Lake Ontario in 1814
This list is not absolutely accurate because of changes in some ships, and propagandists exaggerating or discounting ships' capabilities. Most of the American schooners (which had been alarmingly unstable with their heavy armament) had been disarmed and were now used as transports only. The British had re-rigged their schooners as brigs and renamed most of their ships since many of them belonging to the Provincial Marine had names which duplicated those of Royal Navy ships in commission at sea.[12][13]
Nationality | Name | Type | Tonnage | Crew | Armament | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | Superior | frigate | 1,580 | 500 | 30 long 32-pdr 2 long 24-pdr 26 42-pdr carronade |
4 guns later removed |
" | Mohawk | frigate | 1,350 | 350 | 26 long 24-pdr 2 long 18-pdr 14 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | General Pike | sloop | 875 | 300 | 26 long 24-pdr 2 long 24-pdr chase guns |
|
" | Madison | corvette | 593 | 200 | 2 long 12-pdr 22 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Jones | brig | 500 | 160 | 2 long 12-pdr 20 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Jefferson | brig | 500 | 160 | 2 long 12-pdr 20 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Sylph | brig | 300 | 100 | 2 long 12-pdr 14 24-pdr carronade |
|
" | Oneida | brig | 243 | 100 | 2 long 12-pdr 14 24-pdr carronade |
|
Britain | St. Lawrence | battleship | 2,305 | unknown | 28 long 32-pdr 40 long 24-pdr 4 68-pdr carronade 32 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Prince Regent | frigate | 1,450 | 485 | 32 long 24-pdr 4 68-pdr carronade 22 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Princess Charlotte | frigate | 1,215 | 315 | 26 long 24-pdr 2 68-pdr carronade 14 32-pdr carronade |
|
" | Montreal | sloop | 637 | 220 | 7 long 24-pdr 18 long 18-pdr |
formerly Wolfe |
" | Niagara | sloop | 510 | 200 | 2 long 12-pdr 20 32-pdr carronade |
formerly Royal George |
" | Charwell | brig | 279 | 110 | 2 long 12-pdr 14 32-pdr carronade |
formerly Moira |
" | Star | brig | 262 | 110 | 2 long 12-pdr 14 32-pdr carronade |
formerly Melville |
" | Netley | brig | 216 | 100 | 2 long 12-pdr 14 24-pdr carronade |
formerly Beresford |
" | Magnet | brig | 187 | 80 | 2 long 12-pdr 12 24-pdr carronade |
formerly Sydney Smith Destroyed |
[edit] Ships under construction in 1815
Nationality | Name | Type | Tonnage | Crew | Armament | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | New Orleans | battleship | 2,805 | unknown | 130 guns (mainly 42-pdr) |
not completed |
" | Chippawa | battleship | unknown | unknown | 130 guns (mainly 42-pdr) |
not completed[14] |
" | Plattsburgh | frigate | 1,748 | unknown | "64 guns" | not completed |
Britain | Wolfe (II) | battleship | 2,152 | unknown | 36 long 32pdr 76 long 24pdr / 24-pdr carronade |
not completed (laid down 1814, cancelled 1831, hull destroyed on stocks by storm 31 July 1832) |
" | Canada | battleship | 2,152 | unknown | 36 long 32pdr 76 long 24pdr / 24-pdr carronade |
not completed (laid down 1814, cancelled 1832) |
" | Psyche | frigate | 769 | 315 | 28 long 24-pdr 28 32-pdr carronade |
Frame constructed in Britain, 1814 |
[edit] Aftermath
After the Treaty of Ghent which ended the war, an separate pact known as the Rush-Bagot Treaty was signed in 1817, to limit the number and strength of warships which could be maintained on the Lakes. On Lake Ontario, Britain and America could keep in commission one vessel each, of no more than 100 tons, and armed with one 18-pounder gun. No other armed ships could be built, and those already built should be dismantled.
In fact, very few of the existing ships were broken up. The British constructed a storehouse, referred to as a "stone frigate", to keep the rigging and other fittings. In theory, they could have recommissioned their entire squadron within a few days. By 1827, all the ships were mouldering, and unfit for service. The stores were auctioned in 1834 and the surviving ships were written off or disposed of over the next few years.
The American squadron also quickly fell into disrepair. It had been acknowledged when they were built that they would last only five or six years, with their green wood and rough finish. One survivor was the unfinished battleship New Orleans, which was enclosed by a great shed on the slipway, and not sold until 1883.[15]
[edit] Results
Because neither side had been prepared to risk everything in a decisive attack on the enemy fleet or naval base, the result of all the construction effort on Lake Ontario was an expensive draw. The great demands for men and materials made by both squadrons adversely affected other parts of the war effort.
The Americans had been based at Sacket's Harbor, and this small town was unable to cope with the great numbers of soldiers, sailors and shipwrights there. There were many deaths from cold, exposure and inadequate rations during the winter months, and from disease during the summer. On the British side, the effort required to ship all the ordnance and naval stores up the Saint Lawrence prevented them from deploying decisive numbers of troops in Upper Canada. Prevost once reported paying £1,000 to transport one monstrous cable for the battleship Saint Lawrence to Kingston.
Both Yeo and Chauncey have been criticised by historians for their unwillingness to act decisively, and for the long and rambling excuses they made in their despatches for their setbacks. Chauncey has come in for more abuse from American historians than Yeo has from British historians. Roosevelt (and subsequent historians) argued that, since the overall American strategy was offensive, the American forces on Lake Ontario ought to have risked a decisive attack against Kingston, or Chauncey should have sought a decisive action against Yeo's squadron when opportunity offered.[16] Instead, Chauncey (and the Army commanders Dearborn and Wilkinson) repeatedly shied away from any attack on Kingston, while Chauncey failed to pursue Yeo to destruction after the action in Burlington Bay. After the British attack on Sackett's Harbor, Chauncey continually hampered operations against targets other than Kingston. He either kept his vessels in port waiting for more ships, or refused to use them to support the Army's attacks elsewhere (on the Niagara peninsula, for example).[17]
By contrast, it has been argued that since the British strategy (under Governor General Sir George Prevost) was defensive, Yeo needed only to avoid defeat, and certainly succeeded in this.[18] However, British (and Canadian) historians such as Forester and J. Mackay Hitsman have argued that he did so at such cost that other operations were curtailed or thwarted. (For example, Yeo's hoarding of men and supplies, and failure to forward sufficient of these to the British squadron on Lake Erie, led to their decisive defeat. Similarly, a far smaller effort on Lake Champlain that that required to construct battleships on Lake Ontario would have made British victory on Champlain certain, and decisive.[19]) From the American side, Roosevelt lauded Yeo's second-in-command (Commander William Mulcaster) as a far more decisive and energetic officer than Yeo, who might have undertaken operations which could permanently thwart American designs.
[edit] Notes
- ^ C. Winton-Clare, A Shipbuilders' War, in M. Zaslow (ed.), The Defended Border, p. 167
- ^ Forester, The Age of Fighting Sail, p.122
- ^ J. Mackay Hitsman, The Incredible War of 1812, pp. 147-9
- ^ Elting, Amateurs to Arms, p.99
- ^ Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812, pp. 131-135
- ^ Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812, pp. 135-136
- ^ Roosevelt, The Naval War or 1812, pp.136-139
- ^ Elting, Amateurs to Arms, p.142
- ^ Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812, p. 125
- ^ J. Mackay Hitsman, The Incredible War of 1812, pp. 209-210
- ^ Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812, pp. 200-201
- ^ Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812, pp. 196-197
- ^ J. Mackay Hitsman, The Incredible War of 1812, p.345 fn
- ^ Accounts vary as to whether this ship was indeed a sister ship to New Orleans or a frigate the size of Superior. Very little work had been done on it before construction was halted. C. Winton-Clare, A Shipbuilders' War, in M. Zaslow (ed.), The Defended Border, p. 172
- ^ R.A. Preston, The Fate of Kingston's Warships, in M. Zaslow (ed.), The Defended Border, pp. 283-295
- ^ Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812, pp. 203-204
- ^ Elting, Amateurs to Arms, p.188
- ^ Elting, Amateurs to Arms, p.94, p.102
- ^ C.S.Forester, The Age of Fighting Sail, pp.187-188
[edit] References
- Theodore Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812, Modern Library, New York, ISBN 0-375-75419-9
- John R. Elting, Amateurs to Arms, Da Capo Press, New York, ISBN 0-306-80653-3
- C.S. Forester, The Age of Fighting Sail, New English Library, ISBN 0-939218-06-2
- Colledge, J. J. and Warlow, Ben (2006). Ships of the Royal Navy: the complete record of all fighting ships of the Royal Navy, Rev. ed., London: Chatham. ISBN 9781861762818. OCLC 67375475.