Talk:Endpoint (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Endpoint (band) is within the scope of WikiProject Louisville, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.

[edit] Page name

Discussion moved here from WP:RM for archival purposes. Please do not add material here; instead, do it below. Noel (talk) 14:35, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] EndpointEndpoint (band)

"Endpoint" much more frequently means the geometric or chemical endpoint and thus this page should probably be moved to a more specific name and this page house the common definition -- 68.39.174.205 09:11, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • There's no need to post this here: if you create an account and log in, you can do this move yourself. Gdr 12:23, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)
  • Semi-support. On the other hand, if you don't want to create an account, this is quite a good place to mention it. It looks like the article is the the style of an in-place disambig, but it is confusing and not what I would expect to find at this page. It originally started out as just reference to the 90's bad. It is not really a move that is required, so much as a demerge, and turning the current page into a pure disambig, (at least until someone has more to say about the math/chemistry uses). - Solipsist 20:11, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Seems sensible. I moved the band page and put in a disambig. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:52, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] [New posts]

Good grief, this article is sub-par. No citations, no references, a bunch of unsupported generalizations ... Jamiem 19:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)