Talk:Endgame (Derrick Jensen books)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Endgame (Derrick Jensen books) article.

Article policies
Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Environment
Portal
This environment-related article is part of the Environment WikiProject to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment.
The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
See WikiProject Environment and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Balance

Nice article. It needs balance and context, relation to previous works by other authors, the school of thought it is from, the school of thought its critics are from, its critics and what they say about it. -- Stbalbach 15:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pacifism

this paragraph is hard to read. its is very unclear what Jensen's position is on pacifism b/c the jumble of sentences goes back and forth between what he's refuting and what he's acknowledging. There are too many non-Jensen quotes here and quote-for-quote it is hard to understand whether jensen is agreeing or disagreeing. It would be better to state jensen's position first instead of stating his negative position b/c it makes jensen look like he doesn't have a certain opinion on pacifism, which shouldn't be the case given the heading of the paragraph. - hypomnemata nov.27th 2006, 12pm

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Endgame-V1.jpg

Image:Endgame-V1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Endgame-V2.jpg

Image:Endgame-V2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


I fixed both of them. Murderbike (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)