Endocerid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Endocerid Fossil range: Ordovician - ?Silurian |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
||||||||||
| Scientific classification | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| families | ||||||||||
|
† Proterocameroceratidae |
The endocerids were a diverse group of cephalopods that lived from the Early Ordovician possibly to the Late Silurian . Their shells varied in form. Some were straight (orthoconic) others curved (cyrtoconic); some were long (longiconic), others short (breviconic). Some long-shelled forms like Endoceras attained lengths as much as 3.5m (11 ft 8 in). The related Cameroceras is anecdotally reported to have reached lengths approaching 11m (36 feet), but these claims are not unproblematic (Teichert and Kummel 1960). The overwhelming majority of endocerids and nautiloids in general are much smaller, usually less than a meter long fully grown.
Contents |
[edit] Morphology
Endocerids have a relatively small living chamber and a generally large siphuncle that indicates much of the visceral mass of the animal may have been housed within the siphuncle itself, unlike other nautiloids in which the body is restricted to the body chamber. Endocerids are primarily distinguished however by the presence of calcareous deposits formed in the more apical portion of the siphuncle known as endocones., assumed to counterweight the animal’s body. The chambers (camerae) of endocerids are always free of organic deposits, unlike other orders such as the Michelinocerida and Actinocerada.
[edit] Extent
Endocerids were among some half a dozen cephalopod orders that appeared in the Lower Ordovician. They reached their greatest diversity during the Lower to Mid-Ordovician, but were already in decline by the middle of this period with most genera becoming extinct by the end of the Ordovician, while some rare hangers on lasted into the Silurian. In any case, the endocerid lineage became completely extinct relatively early on in cephalopod history.
[edit] Derivation and Evolution
Endocerids are derived from earlier Ellesmerocerida, most likely from Pachendoceras or similar genus which gave rise to Proendoceras, the earliest of the Proterocameroceratidae and of the Endocerida, through the reduction of siphuncle diaphragms and the development of endocones. From that time, in the early middle Lower Ordovician, the Endocerida quickly diversified, forming different families. Two general evolutionary trends can be recognized. One has to do with increasing complexity of the siphuncle resulting in genera such as Chihlioceras and Allotrioceras. The other has to do with an increase in overall size resulting in such genera as Endoceras and Cameroceras.
[edit] Taxonomy, Classification
Curt Teichert placed the Endocerida in its own cephalopod subclass, the Endoceroidea, citing its diversity (alternatively referred to by some Russian paleontologists as a superorder). Rousseau Flower rejected this idea on the grounds that endocerids were no more diverse or complex than any other order and considered them simply another order within the Nautiloidea.
The Endocerida have been divided (Flower 1958) into two suborders, the Proterocamerocerina and the Endocerina, which respectively follow the two primary evolutionary trends, above. The Proterocamerocerina includes the Proterocameroceratidae, Manchurocheratidae, and Allotrioceratidae. The Endocerina includes the Piloceratidae and Endoceratidae.
[edit] Ecology
Endocerids may have included the superpreditors of the Ordovician, probably living close to the sea bottom where they could easily snatch an unwary trilobite or crustacean . They were probably not active nectonic swimmers, but rather crawled over the sea floor or lay there in ambush. They probably filled a different ecological niche than that filled by such as sharks and squid today.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
Flower, R. H. 1955, Status of Endoceroid Classification; Jour. Paleon. V 29. n.3 May 1955,pp 327-370; figs,plates.
— — — 1958, Some Chazyan and Mohawkian Endoceratida, Jour Paleon V 32,n 2,May 1858, pp 433-458;figs,plates.
— — — 1976, Ordovician Cephalopod Faunas and Their Role in Correlation,in Bassett,M.C.(Ed);The Ordovician System: Proceedings of a Paleontological Association Symposium; Birmingham,Eng.1974;Univ of Wales and Welsh Nat’l Mus Press.
Teichert, C. 1964, Endoceratoidea, in the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, VolK(Nautiloidea; Geol Soc of America and University of Kansas Press;pp K160–K188; figs.
Teichert, C., and B. Kummel 1960, Size of Endocerid Cephalopods; Breviora Mus. Comp. Zool. No. 128, 1–7.
- Monks, Neale and Palmer, Philip. Ammonites. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C. 2002.
