Talk:Encounter (magazine)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Controversial?
While I'll agree that the funding scandal created controversy, I don't know that the magazine was ever considered controversial in terms of its actual content. Its main positions were well within the mainstream of western political thought and the views the authors expressed can't be considered much different than those in contemporary publications like The New Republic or The Atlantic Monthly' neither of which I think anyone would call "controversial." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsfreeman (talk • contribs) 11:43, March 14, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spender's resignation
This doesn't really make sense. Spender could hardly have resigned in 1966 over the CIA funding revelations if the self-same revelations did not emerge until the next year? Could he?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.110.104 (talk • contribs) 12:17, May 7, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unreferenced
This article is now tagged due to lack of citations; it is a controversial subject; it needs "full citations"; it may involve some people (e.g., Frank Kermode, Irving Kristol), who are still living: WP:BLP applies to it, as do the guidelines and policies cross-linked in the tagged notices. Please sign comments with four tildes. Thank you. --NYScholar 23:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)