User talk:Emperorbma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives:

Contents

[edit] Justification article

Hi,

I noticed that you appeared in the edit history of the justification (theology) article. I recently made major changes to the article in an effort to move it to NPOV. If you have any suggestions for improvement (style, content, whatever), please leave a comment on the talk page for that article. The goal is to get the article to the point that the POV and cleanup templates can be removed.

Thanks, --jrcagle 20:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] You can fix profiles of characters at Guadam

You can do research and add profiles. The link is http://www.gundamofficial.com/worlds/uc/msg/characters/

[edit] Copyright violation allegations: Tourism in Japan

Hi Emperorbma,

A user has put a copyright violation template on the article Tourism in Japan, to which you (and I) contributed. I think the copying is in reverse, that is, the external site copied the Wikipedia article. What do you think?

Fg2 20:58, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Theology of glory page

[edit] Theology of Glory

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Theology of Glory, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Theology of Glory. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Pastordavid 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

That'd make sense to me. I have revised the theology of the cross page (no references tonight, I should get to that first thing in the morning). Since I put up the prod on the theology of glory page, someone else should merge it. Pastordavid 06:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted vandalism

I've reverted some apparent vandalism to your userpage by this anon IP, and warned the vandal. Walton Vivat Regina! 18:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Lutheranism

You are invited to participate in Lutheranism WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Lutheranism. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!





-- Pastordavid 22:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lutheranism

The WikiProject Lutheranism Collaboration Project is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{Lutheran COTM}}. -- Pastordavid 19:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstars

Please stop by and give your opinion on the two proposed barnstars for WikiProject Lutheranism. Pastor David † (Review) 18:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Geologic timescale

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Geologic timescale seems to be inactive. The idea is to take it under the roof of the Geology Project. Would you mind joining it? Solarapex 23:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: Edinburgh underground city

A reading of the opening paragraph of underground city is enough to know it doesn't really apply to Edinburgh. Today the term "Underground City" is mostly exploited by the tourist industry, but it's hardly warranted. I'll expand on it in the Edinburgh article and restore the wikilink somehow. Bendž|Ť 17:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for heads up

I renamed the userboxes page that you asked me about (it was inadvertently misnamed--first time I'd created such a page); and I archived our discussion a few hours later. (You can find it now in User talk:NYScholar/Archive 11.) Do you think that the old page needs to be deleted, or would requesting that deletion now delete the redirected page? Thanks. If you reply here, I will find see your reply. (Please see: User:NYScholar/Userboxes for the renamed/redirected page.) --NYScholar 19:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

  • You're welcome and I'm glad my comment was helpful. :) Also, it probably would be a good idea to check everything in Special:Whatlinkshere/User:NYScholar/Userboxes to see if anything important (besides automated lists) links to it. I didn't see it in the Rules, but I think that usually the admins frown on user stuff in the main namespace because it might mess with search results, so it probably would be good to ask about deletion. -- EmperorBMA|話す 19:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again. I have asked for the earlier page to be deleted. --NYScholar 06:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Incurvatus in se

Hope you don't mind the secularisation, but I feel it is essential to WP:NPOV, as well as to establishing the individuals you cite as real people, philosophers and WP:RS? Though a committed atheist I have a lifelong affection for theology as a discipline and theologians as thinkers.

I am delighted to see a theological construct that is over a thousand years old that parallels EXACTLY the relatively modern (in spite of the classical connotations of it's name) concept of "Narcissism". Particularly if you look at Narcissism (psychology) and the way the psychoanalysts developed the concept. --Zeraeph 17:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for great ref, it is SO important to show that there is more to Narcissism as a concept than online pop psychology. Is it not curious how close Martin Luther (and very likely Augustine) were to the thinking of Freud and later others? --Zeraeph 16:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Or course we tend to forget that these people were not special "biblical and historical" people, with especially limited "biblical and historical"minds and lives...truth is, I suppose the philosophers and priests often took the same role as the psychologists of today. --Zeraeph 18:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notice: Request for Speedy Delete (H-World)

A tag has been placed on H-World, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No assertion of importance of subject.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

[edit] AfD nomination of Wallaby (manga)

Wallaby (manga), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Wallaby (manga) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallaby (manga) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wallaby (manga) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Quasirandom 19:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] VirtualDubMod

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article VirtualDubMod, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nanori

Hi! I saw you created Nanori in Wiktionary. I'm a Japanese and there is no meaning of the No.1 definition of Nanori in Japanese. I checked Kojien and other dictionaries but couldn't find the meaning. Other Japanese editor pointed out the same thing on the talk page too. Please correct the article. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi again! Sorry it was illiterate of me. Please forget about it. Best regards. Oda Mari (talk) 10:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Virtues of Ultima

An editor has nominated Virtues of Ultima, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtues of Ultima and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)