Talk:Employee-owned corporation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Copyright violations
I reverted this edit due to coptyright violations from several sources, including: [1], [2] and [3]. - Akamad 01:36, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Point of view
This article seems to discuss specific levels of tax break as if they were natural law. Judging by spelling and references to "federal income tax", I presume these levels refer to the USA.
Please remember that Wikipedia is an international encyclopaedia, and as such we cannot assume any specific cultural or political context; these must be stated explicitly. Hairy Dude 02:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suggestion
So how about putting the general stuff up top (don't think there is any right now - well maybe the Harvard stuff, and I'm not smart enough to make it up on the fly) then cram the current article into a heading US Employee-Owned Corporations —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.66.120.135 (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Intro
I removed some of the financial details from the intro and added information on the pros and cons of employee ownership, which I thought would be of high general interest. I also broke "advantages" into advantages for employees and advantages to the company as a whole, since they seem to be fairly distinct topics in this context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inhumandecency (talk • contribs) 20:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Page name wrong
This page is called employee-owned corporations, but then it says it's about companies owned in part by employees. This is just a bit silly. If it's employee owned, that means it's all employee owned. Otherwise it's like just about any company on the planet. Companies almost always have employees owning a small stake, directly or indirectly. I think there needs to be a separate page too for ESOPs, i.e. Employee Share Ownership Plans. This is nothing to do with Employee owned companies. Thoughts? Wikidea 16:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed - it seems too much of a mish mash, but as of today the pieces seem too short to split out on their own. To add more confusion to the mix, I recall that there was a time when the term ESOP was used in the UK for management-employee buyouts. However, if you see a need for a split, I think you should just go ahead and do it. Most of this article could be moved to a generic article called Employee ownership --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have read it again, and I think the domoniance of the article is about Employee ownership or Employee stock ownership, not at all about the Employee-owned corporation often called the Employee-owned company. I think it is time for a move, and to start another article at this title. Wik, I think you should go ahead and move to one of those titles. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 08:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)