User:Emoscopes/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orthography requests

Please leave a request here for any aircaft 3-view drawings you would like me to produce for Wikimedia Commons. Please give as much contextual information as you can, for instance;

Is there a particular mark or model you would prefer?
Is there a special feature of the aicraft you would like to be obvious
Are there any unusual variants you would like included to highlight differences.

I will respond to your requests here so please add this page to your watch list. I will endeavour to fulfil your requests to the best of my ability, however, please don't be offended if it takes me a short while to respond, or if I just cannot fulfil your request.
Thanks for your patience and understanding! Emoscopes ^Talk

1 Requests

[edit] Requests

[edit] B-17 Flying Fortress

~~Would prefer the G variant, if only one is chosen, but perhaps a few nose sections could be compared.~~

~~OK, I'm on to that one. Emoscopes ^Talk 19:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)~~

Filled and added to the article. Please let me know if there are any glaring errors, I am not intimately familiar with American aircraft and I had to do some research to find out the major differences between models. Emoscopes ^Talk 17:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BillCJ's requests

This list is going to be a doozy! I've been involved in creating sevreal new articles in the past few months, and most of them need 3-views. I'll try to be as specific as I can, but feel free to ask for clarifiaction or suggestions, either here or on my talk page. I don't expect you to do them all at once, or even in the next few weeks. I have no idea how long you take to do one 3-view, but I'm not in a hurry. Consider this a To-do List if you run short on other "orders". - BillCJ 05:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

UH-1N Twin Huey and Bell 212 - These articles have the same 3-view, labeled "Bell UH-1N MODEL 212". I don't know if the 3-view is more representative of the military or civil models. THe layout of this three-view is how I'd prefer most of the new layouts I'm requesting, unless it's not practical/possible to do that way, or I specify otherwise.
- Bell 212 - whatever best represents a standard 212 would be fine, including the existing 3-view if it's a civil. There are some modifications, such as fire-fighting, that might be cool to show with a side-view, but that's not necessary to the article.
- UH-1N Twin Huey - whatever best represents the standard UN-1N would be fine. The late-model USMC UH-1N has a nose FLIR turret, and maybe some other visual differences. A side-view of that over or under the standard UH-1N side-view would be good. THere is one derivitive with a very distinct look: the Agusta-Bell 212ASW. It has a readr dome on top of the fuselage in front of the rotor, and over the cockpit/cabin. A side-view of this one would suffice, especially if you think the other views would not be that different from the standard models.

UH-1 Iroquois and Bell 204/205 - These articles have the same 3-view, labeled "Bell UH-1 IROQUOIS". This a long model (UH-1D/UH-1H and 205). Again, I don't know if the 3-view is more representative of the military or civil models. THere is a whole list of variants in this article. I'm asking for the major ones that differ greatly. Feel free to browse the list, and if you find a model you think is interesting enough to illustrate, feel free to do so. At some point, I would like to split this article again, so having more 3-views would be good. But we don't need 6 or 8 in this one article right now, so staggering the production would be fine.
- Bell 204/205 - need two separate 3-views, one of the Bell 204, and one of the 205. Standard 3-views are fine; I don't know of many derivitive sub-models or mods that are externally different.

- UH-1 Iroquois - This article covers most of the military Huey variants, and there are several that bear illustrating.
  - UH-iA or UH-1B - short model, similar to the 204.
  - UH-1C - a UH-1B with improved engine, used mostly in the gunship role. Carried guns and rockets on the sides, and a gredae launchre in the nose. I would love a full three-view of this one, or at least a side-view in with the UH-1A/B in the interim.
  - UH-1D or UH-1H - long body, similar to civil Bell 205. Either the D or the H would be fine. THere are some visual differences, but not enough to worry about now. I may try to make a new article for just these two models in the future; at that point, I would request the other version's 3-view. But as long as they are still in the main article, one is enough.

UH-1Y Venom - This is the USMC's upgrade of the UH-1N, with the tail and engines of the AH-1Z. THere aore going to be a few rebuilt from UH-1Ns, but the bulk will be new-builds. I don't know if there will be any visual differences between the two. If they are the same (meaning you won't need two side views of them), it would be good to include a side view of the UH-1N for comparison.

Bell 533 - a short UH-1 with jet engines and short wings. Haven't found a pic for this article yet, so a 3- view would be good to have.

OK Bill, that's quite a list :) But I shall see what I can do, it will just need a little time. Emoscopes ^Talk

P.S, I can normally knock out a few 3-views in a day, depending upon time and the quality of references I can find. Emoscopes ^Talk 07:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

- Take your time on these, I don't care if it takes a few months or more to get to them all. I do have lots more! :) I haven't even gotten half the Bells that need them, and the then there's the Sikorskys! Seriously, a lot of the helicopter articles lack any 3-views, and some of the more obsure ones don't even have useable (permission-wise) pics. Whatever you can do to help is greatly appreciated, as nothing has been done at all till now. I have no idea how you even do these! Anyway, take your time on mine, I'm absolutely in no hurry. - BillCJ 17:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shorts aircraft

~~You have already done a great side view of the Short Seamew - it enhances the article greatly! Thanks.~~

~~It would be really good to have a 3-view of the Short SB/4 Sherpa - I can send you a 3-view outline drawing if that would help you.~~

~~Filled and added to article. Emoscopes ^Talk 20:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)~~

~~Also the Short Bomber article would be greatly improved by a 3-view! But the list goes on and on! Thanks again! What a brilliant offer! TraceyR 13:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)~~

Filled and added to article. Emoscopes ^Talk 23:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Great stuff! Thanks. TraceyR 20:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you willing to produce 3-views of the SB/5 in its three different wing configurations (50°, 69° and 69° sweep)? The article was recently assessed as Start class, so perhaps the addition of this material would nudge it towards a better classification. I can scan in views of the 50° and 60° drawings as a basis and email them to you; I haven't yet found a view of the 69° configuration. Happy Hogmanay! --TraceyR (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

~~Fantastic! That is a really useful contribution to the SB/5 article - thanks. I'll have to find out how to award you another barnstar!! --TraceyR (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)~~

[edit] 3 requests

~~Flettner Fl 282, ~~Focke-Wulf FW 61~~, Vought-Sikorsky 300 --Born2flie 12:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC) (moved by BillCJ)~~

One filled. Emoscopes ^Talk 15:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Su-17M4

You do incredible work, would you mind sharing some of your techniques? I would like to request Su-17M4/Su-22M4 for Sukhoi Su-17. The current 3-view is of the Su-17M2 which does not go with the M4 specs. Su-17M4 has a Su-17UM/Su-17M3 fuselage with the tall spine and a drooped nose, ram air scoop at the base of the tail, additional underwing pylons for AAMs, and in post-Afghanistan aircraft multiple (up to 12, depending on the specific aircraft) flare ejectors around the mid-fuselage. Thanks! - Emt147^Burninate! 18:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Filled. Emoscopes ^Talk 21:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CF-105 Arrow

I've seen your awesome art, and I think you should apply your skills to making a drawing of the CF-105. Please do the RL205 paint scheme (one of those orange and white Arrows). P.S. Can you do one of those colour images like you did for the TSR-2? Canada-kawaii 01:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Anyway, can you upload an SVG version of the image? That would rock. 142.179.125.143 01:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DhruvK's requests

Airbus A320 - 318 - 321 (any and all would be appreciated!) Dhruvk 04:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] OH-58 Kiowa

Two variants. The OH-58A and the OH-58D. The current 3-view of the "OH-58D" is a profile of the OH-58A and doesn't resemble the OH-58D engine deck with or without the mast-mounted sight (MMS). --Born2flie 21:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PeterCalamy's requests

As a naval enthusiast, I am hugely impressed with your ship views, both for their clarity and painstaking historical accuracy. Do you think you perhaps do views of the USS North Carolina (BB 55), USS South Dakota (BB 57), and USS Iowa (BB 61), all lead ships of their respective classes in the United States Navy. PeterCalamy 17:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, not an aeroplane! Emoscopes ^Talk 21:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] S. Cisar's requests

We would like to ask for permission using an image that we found on Wikipedia, please contact me at sasha at hosoyaschaefer dot com for a detailed request for permission. We would like to include your diagram of the Short SC1 for a documentary on mobility. Kind Regards, S. Cisar, HosoyaSchaefer Architects.

[edit] The Land: Steam Turbine animation

Is there any chance you could make an animation of a steam turbine? I made good use of [1] and [2] in Pre-dreadnought battleship. Now I'm working on Dreadnought, and a good diagram of a turbine would really liven up that section of the article. Many thanks, The Land (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)