Talk:Emohawk: Polymorph II

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Red Dwarf     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Red Dwarf, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Red Dwarf on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article. Feel free to add your name to the participants list and/or contribute to the discussions. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject BBC      (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments) Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the BBC WikiProject. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: Here are some tasks you can do: Merge: Suggested merge of Criticism of the BBC into BBC controversies (Discuss) Cleanup: Newsnight, BBC Prime, BBC Two Northern Ireland Expand: All 10 start-class BBC articles with Top importance - see here, BBC Lifestyle Stubs: Stub-Class BBC articles Update: BBC Portal NPOV: Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Other: Ensure all our articles have the talk page template added to their talk pages. Add free use images for biographical articles. Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes. Get our new task force on BBC Sitcoms going. Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC. WikiProject Television      (Rated stub-Class) WikiProject Television     (Rated Stub-Class) Television Portal This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-Importance on the importance scale. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject British TV shows This article is part of WikiProject British TV shows, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British TV shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project British TV shows, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. WikiProject Science Fiction This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article. Feel free to add your name to the participants list and/or contribute to the discussion. ??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Article issues

• 3rd party sources - Most of the references are from the BBC or RedDwarf.co.uk (the official site).
• Notability - The article doesn't establish notability and lacks 3rd party sources.
• Insufficient context - I think this edit should help [1] (it clarifies that RD is a sci-fi sitcom).
• Unencyclopedic

I did not tag the article, I'm clarifying what I think needs to be done. --Mrwojo (talk) 19:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your efforts in contributing to this article, Mrwojo. But as you've probably discovered yourself, 3rd party sources on this episode are hard to find, if they exist at all. And because of this the article will never gain notability.

While I agree with the Tag, it still seems strange that a non-current British television series receives so much attention yet there are so many more articles deserving of the same treatment, e.g. There must be about 400 plus Simpsons articles with the majority of them failing the exact same Tag issues. --Nreive (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Since the series itself is notable, and every other episode in the series is listed, it would be stupid to delete this one article as 'non-notable'. Applying common sense -- Tags removed. EdJogg (talk) 00:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)