User talk:Emir214

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I still hold the account. Even though I have made another account, I would like to clear my name, by the unblocking of this account. You can send an e-mail using the Special:Emailuser function and confirm my identity by responding to your mail. You can also leave a message at my account in the Tagalog Wikipedia here."

Decline reason: "This does not address the reason for this block. Additionally, the link you provided goes to a deleted page. — Yamla 14:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I never showed the password to the public anywhere, not even on my user page. To assert my control on this account, post a message to my account in the Tagalog Wikipedia here."

Decline reason: "See links in Chaser's note, offered his account to the public and CU confirmed sock puppetry. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

NOTE TO 2nd request:I've asked the blocking admin if he recalls what evidence there was for the block, ie, evidence of sharing passwords. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

It's in the second to last deleted revision of his userpage here. The same text is reproduced in this ANI thread. In any case, the editor could simply make an edit with the Tagalog account including the text "I have the same account on the English Wikipedia." and put a diff link here. However, there remains this issue.--chaser - t 16:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have not abused any accounts. User:Men72194 is not mine."

Decline reason: "I am sorry but it appears you have. You've now had 3 reviews of the block, please do not post further unblock requests. — Shell babelfish 07:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Contents

[edit] Register new account

Am I still allowed to create a new account? - Emir214 09:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Expand user article

A tag has been placed on Template:Expand user article requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:That's so raven karaoke.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:That's so raven karaoke.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User diffcomp

A tag has been placed on Template:User diffcomp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)