Talk:Eminenti Apostolatus Specula
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
| This article falls within the scope of the Interfaith work group. If you are interested in Interfaith-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help. If you have any comments regarding the appropriateness or positioning of this template, please let us know at our talk page.
|
||
[edit] “aliisque de iustis ac rationabilibus causis Nobis notis”
Could we include a translation of this phrase, please... I know it is sad, but fewer and fewer people speak Latin these days. :>) Blueboar 19:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm looking at it again and it doesn't make sense. My Latin is non-existent so my attempt "because we note that some of reasonable right" could mean anything. I'll get rid of it shortly. --JASpencer 23:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Title
The title Eminenti Apostolatus Specula is incorrect in two aspects, I believe: conventionally, only the first word is capitalized in a papal bull, and no words are omitted. It is also a general convention that incipits are of two words, not including minor words, thus correctly In eminenti apostolatus: I do notice that the Latin text at Papalencyclicals.net just gives In eminenti; the compilers must be giving unusual weight to in, one can only suppose.--Wetman 19:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
