Emin's Pouched Rat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Emin's Pouched Rat | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Conservation status | ||||||||||||||||||
| Scientific classification | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Binomial name | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cricetomys emini Wroughton, 1910 |
The Emin's Pouched Rat (Cricetomys emini), also known as the African pouched rat, is a large "rat" of the muroid superfamily. It is related to Cricetomys gambianus, or Gambian pouched rat.
They are native to Africa and are found along the edges of forests and along the plains. Emin's rats are actually better climbers than their better known Gambian pouch rat cousins. These pouched rats are named for having cheek pouches much like a hamster.
The emin's rat and Gambian rat have a few very noticeable physical differences:
- The emin's rat has a distinct line of color difference between their lower abdomen area and upper body. The abdomen is a grey/white color whereas their upper body is a dark brown color. The tail has a white tip to it. Gambian rats are a greyish brown color that is fairly uniform throughout their body, only gradually getting lighter on their abdomen.
- Emin's rats are very sleek and muscular in appearance. They're quite slender looking, and are excellent climbers. Gambians are somewhat bulky, rough looking, and have been reported to be less "arboreal" than the emin's.
- Emin's rats tend to weigh less and be slightly smaller than the Gambian rat.
Both species were introduced into the exotic pet trade. Unfortunately, many dealers and breeders failed to recognize the difference in the two species and some even tried breeding the two together. There have been reports of it being successful, and other reports of offspring dying at birth. Both species can make excellent pets, but males can be territorial to others of the same species.
[edit] References
- Van der Straeten & Kerbis Peterhans (2004). Cricetomys emini. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN 2006. Retrieved on 11 May 2006. Database entry includes a brief justification of why this species is of least concern
