User talk:Embhee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi Embhee, I just saw your note on this page and wanted to let you know that a Sahaj Marg page has been published. Please feel free to add to that page or discussion. Right now we are discussing if there is ever a time we should use primary sources with no secondary sources and your opinion would be appreciated. Welcome! Renee (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your comment
Embhee,
I noticed you added a comment on CFW's sock case here. While its a useful comment, just wanted to let you know that an admin has placed a block on CFW's account during which time we are not supposed to modify the sock page. Also I moved it up (away from Conclusion). Thanks for looking out to support this case! --Duty2love (talk) 03:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Rfd
The rfd you voted on is to delete this, a redirect page [[1]]
Not the whole page itself, so maybe you could modify your comments?
peace,
Sethie (talk) 02:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Heya-
If you want your vote to have some weight behind it, I suggest you erase this comment: . Sahaj Marg has been published here. There is no need for this [1] "proposed" userpage anymore, and replace it with a reason why you think the redirect should be deleted. Sethie (talk) 03:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)r
[edit] Age sentence in Sahaj Marg article
Hi Embhee
Thanks for your comment [here]. If we had some good secondary sources that helped us to add some commentary and color on the effects of Sahaj Marg meditation on people less than 18 years of age, I would agree with you. I'd then love to see a more lucid and full-bodied discussion on this topic. However, there are no such sources that are freely available. Without such background material, just a statement saying you need to be older than 18 buys us nothing in making this a more valuable article. I believe that's what Persian Poet Gal was pointing out on Renee's talk page.
But yes, the world will still keep rotating with or without this line. :)
Marathi_Mulgaa (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
