User talk:Eludium-q36

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Eludium-q36, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Jeff3000 21:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] link to Objective

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something Objective, please do not link to Objective, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as Objectivity (science) by writing out [[Objectivity (science)|objective]]. Regards, Jeff3000 21:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ben Mills

I appreciate that AfDs are rarely unanimous and those on the losing side may well be disappointed, but to me the issue looked clear-cut. I must point out that the closing admin normally just says "Keep", "Delete" or "No consensus" without giving reasons. However, my reasoning was that I looked at the debate, and the arguments on both sides, and concluded that the arguments for deletion were stronger than those for retention. You do have the right to make an appeal on Wikipedia:Deletion_review.--Runcorn 10:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.sport.pro-wrestling (2nd nomination)

You contributed to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.sport.pro-wrestling (second nomination). This was closed as speedy keep under criterion for speedy deletion G5 as a page created by a banned user, and its content deleted. You may or may not want to contribute to the new discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.sport.pro-wrestling (2nd nomination). This message is being given to all users - except proven sockpuppets and those who have already appeared at the new Afd- who contributed in the original discussion. --Robdurbar 14:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] JykriN

I commented favorably, but it would be stronger if you had a third source from a different publication than the other two. DGG 18:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow, there is something here-good job on that one, I couldn't find much at all! I've withdrawn the nomination accordingly. Seraphimblade 18:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jyrki Niskanen

Great rescue job on the Jyrki Niskanen article - made me smile to see that. Cheers, CiaranG 19:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Raven Article

Eludium. Why do you INSIST on removing the edits made by the Online Editor of Raven, Martin Mackenzie, username mmackenzie? He DOES know rather more about Raven than you you know!! And also why do you INSIST on removing the link to the Raven forum? When the Raven editor himself put it there? And it is relevant to the subject topic!

Please stop doing these things as you are being a hindrance not a help to the accurate and best service to Raven.

    • Jules** 21:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)