Talk:Elkmont, Tennessee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article or page is part of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of ghost towns. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale.
Tennessee
Portal
Elkmont, Tennessee is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member.
[Watch Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Template Usage]
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Builder of Avent Cabin

The Avent Cabin's application for National Registered Historic Place status states that the cabin was built by Sam Cook in 1850. This is apparently an error, since Cook wasn't born until 1873.

Bms4880 21:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Am I missing something?

How is this still a stub class article? It meets the criteria of B-class. If you think it's still a stub, please point out what it's missing. Bms4880 14:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You are right! This is a B-class article

When I looked at this article today I still remembered the topic from when I rated it first, only a few months ago. It was quite a stub article then. What a great surprise to see the article coming out of its cocoon so quickly and developing into a B-class article.

Criteria for a B-class article are met, definitively. Images illustrate the topic nicely, sub-headers devide the topic and treat sub-topics appropriately. The history section is well structured from settlement until today and - best of all - a references section is used, this is going to encourage other authors to continue this tradition.

Just mentioning ... if you made major changes to your article you might want to get in contact with members of the Wikipedia projects your article is part of to request a change in their rating. Articles are not monitored all the time, so some great work might miss the attention for a while. I change the rating for the Tennessee project, please contact the other projects for a re-assessment of their quality rating.

doxTxob \ talk 04:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

    • Ok, good. Just making sure I wasn't missing anything. Thanks. Bms4880 21:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)