.
You probably have ZERO life if all you do is watch for people to edit articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SWAT Pointman (talk • contribs) 21:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Mulberry cheerleader beating.
Do you wanna list it at AfD or shall I or would it be prudent to wait a bit? Cheers, Xdenizen (talk) 01:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Per the Wikipedia:Protection_policy, semi-protection is only supposed to be a temporary measure. It is not supposed to be a permanent solution. It has been four months of protection and even then, the editing was minimal just prior to the protection. I kept it move protected just in case. An edit every two or three days does not seem to require an article to remain in constant semi-protection. If there is a persistent vandal, there is no mention on the talk page or in the protection summaries. Even if there is some vandal, there should be something more done than just protecting the article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Re-protected per One Night In Hackney's comment. Again, since there isn't a mention on the talk page or in the protection summaries, can someone provide a mention (the protection summaries would be best) of the specifics if any are known so that others will know? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- No problem. Again, why not unprotect and reprotect with a note, so that others may known. Never seen a mention of him, but that's probably WP:DENY at work, isn't it? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- With the greatest respect you have no authority to block anybody. I have written hundreds of articles on Wiki and it becomes a bit tiresome when other so called editors delete or vandalise my contributions and if I object they cry foul. Check the amount and quality of work I have done before you take the word of few editors over mine Djln --Djln (talk) 22:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- I will offer my apologies to anybody who has taken offense, but what about the editors who have tried to impose their political beliefs on simple football articles I have written. Or those that have deleted perfectly legitimate categories that I have started. Will you reprimand them ? This is an example what really annoys me and has made me increasingly frustrated. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Ireland-related articles) Djln--Djln (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- A neutral point of view is always welcome. I have it hard to encourage neutrals to get involved Djln--Djln (talk) 00:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
User:P.Grlic
I am looking for puppets of banned users ( example)from territory of ex-Yugoslavia so I am interested to hear of who is puppeteer in this case ??--Rjecina (talk) 11:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- No worries, they're not in ex-Yugoslavia. ~Eliz81(C) 18:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- I am interested because they are playing with Yugoslavia related articles. Your editorial style is similar to mine. I am deleting all text which has been added by banned users :))--Rjecina (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
