User talk:Elijah1383
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
|
[edit] Speedy deletion of Spiritual body
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Spiritual body, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Third Eye article
Your information on the christian view of the third eye is interesting, but please reshape it so it fits this encyclopedia - copying passages from the bible is not very accessible, nor does it easily transfer ideas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.125.101.92 (talk) 14:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually I think that user put it quite well and much more politely than your response on User talk:129.125.101.92. Your edits to Third eye are not exactly constructive. Specifically, Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information. If you need help editng, review Wikipedia:How to edit a page, but you need to be WP:Civil, whether you're talking to an administrator or, as you rather unfortunately put it, "just some guy." Toddst1 (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Third eye has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 01:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)