Talk:Eliab Harvey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Eliab Harvey has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
March 19, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Military work group.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Military biography task force Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): British military history task force

[edit] Links

Removed these from the page as they are not considered reliable enough. They do however provide some interesting information.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

• Sir Eliab Harvey bio
• Animation of the Battle of Trafalgar

[edit] GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

See if something can be done about all the red links. Overall, a good article. -- Secisek (talk) 06:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Virtually all the red links are for warships and MPs who are automatically notable, so the redlinks will eventually change to blue. Of course as WP:Anglicanism members, it's probably up to us to work out if the church is sufficiently notable... Incidentally, whilst it is indeed frowened upon to use flags for places of birth and death (at least partly because, there are questions of self-identification and historical accuracy) there does seem to be a consensus to use them for Allegiance and Branch as these are well-defined matters of fact. David Underdown (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I did my part. The chuch article is stubbed in. -- Secisek (talk) 08:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)