Talk:El Tatio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Chile Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Chile; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (comments)
???	This article has not yet been prioritized.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

	Portal This article is part of WikiProject Volcanoes, a project to systematically present information on volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information), or join by visiting the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance to WikiProject Volcanoes on the project's importance scale.
	If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. Help with this template

[edit] Expand?

Article needs expanding or maybe just merge with a broader topic?

[edit] Name Transliteration

"El Tatio" DOES NOT translates to "the grandfather" in any way!

If you are knowledgeable about the meaning of "El Tatio", please make the appropriate changes on the page. ucsbalan, 26 Apr 06

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Video

Template:Video has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Video the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page.

The nominator Chris Cunningham/User:Thumperward removed the template from all the articles and then nominated it for deletion. This is a well-known Wikipedia:Ownership gambit by stealth removing a feature with mass edits and then claiming it's not used as a reason for deletion.
He then reverted my attempt to keep the video template on an article page at least until the deletion discussion is completed. This prevents editors from making any comparisons on the technical merits of the template, which further forces you to accept his ownership of articles presenting videos. I have requested a Speedy Keep due to his unconsensed mass edits, until there can be an informed and un-owned editorial discussion on the technical merits.
Until he again re-reverts, you can at least temporarily revert his edit to see what the video template looked like, and then consider the technical issues on their merits which are described at the template deletion discussion. Milo 02:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)