Talk:El Gorah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the El Gorah article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

"North Camp in El Gorah was the victim of a horrific string of Joseph and Mary robberies during the Christmas of 2005. The culprit was never caught but the message "No one cares I work in the tool room" was found at the scene."

Could someone please define 'Joseph and Mary robbery'? In addition, could someone please provide details for this particular 'horrific string of Joseph and Mary robberies"?

HopefulRomantic 20:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joseph and Mary Robberies Once Again

"North Camp in El Gorah was the victim of a horrific string of Joseph and Mary robberies during the Christmas of 2005. The culprit was never caught but the message "No one cares I work in the tool room" was found at the scene."

This strange statement has once again been added to this article. Can the contributor please provide an explanation of what this means as no one seems to know what a "Joseph and Mary" robbery is. Can you also provide a source for this, otherwise it will be deleted as an incomprehensible and unsourced statement.

-Ahunt 12:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

In conducting a bit more research on this odd subject I have come to the conclusion that this statement was included in the article get readers to Google "Joseph and Mary robbery", since there is no information on what this means in Wikipedia.

Googling that string seems to only lead to one very aggressive commercial website selling anti-virus software with decoy words on the page and redirects to attract that particular search string.

Therefore I believe this entry is actually a subtle form of commercial spam and is totally irrelevant to the article. Please correct me if I am wrong on this subject. Also please discuss this subject and provide an explanation of what this paragraph means here on the talk page, along with a reliable reference source for the statement before this paragraph is reintroduced to the article.

In the meantime based on what I think I have found out I am deleting this paragraph from the article.

-Ahunt 23:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)